Steam is going balistic

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

It's just majority and minority bias.

Let's say 50% of ppl are "toxic" for whatever reason.

If group A has 100 ppl, you have 50 who are toxic.
If group B has 20 ppl, you have 10 who are toxic.
If now these groups interact with each other, the ppl in group B face a higher total amount of ppl who are toxic, while the toxicity percentage-wise isn't any different.

I don't think it is.

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

It's just majority and minority bias.

Let's say 50% of ppl are "toxic" for whatever reason.

If group A has 100 ppl, you have 50 who are toxic.
If group B has 20 ppl, you have 10 who are toxic.
If now these groups interact with each other, the ppl in group B face a higher total amount of ppl who are toxic, while the toxicity percentage-wise isn't any different.

I don't think it is.

Why?

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

I don't think it is.

Why?

Because what I see in the forums tells me otherwise.

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

I already explained the bias to you.
Again, you are free to feel whatever you want, but you advocated passionately about being constructive, but you basically say, "I think so because I feel like it".

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

I already explained the bias to you.
Again, you are free to feel whatever you want, but you advocated passionately about being constructive, but you basically say, "I think so because I feel like it".

I don't think it's the bias.

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

I already explained the bias to you.
Again, you are free to feel whatever you want, but you advocated passionately about being constructive, but you basically say, "I think so because I feel like it".

I don't think it's the bias.

Why?

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

You know I have a theory. Maybe GGG wants to make players leave, because they already have their money and they want to reduce the community to the people who they know will stay so they can get feedback from that "core" community only, because that's the people whom they will develop and improve the game for.

"

Annastasia_Steele#3866 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

You know I have a theory. Maybe GGG wants to make players leave, because they already have their money and they want to reduce the community to the people who they know will stay so they can get feedback from that "core" community only, because that's the people whom they will develop and improve the game for.

Do you think, theyll made more money from core players or weekend joes ?

"

riotarchangel#2809 wrote:

"

Annastasia_Steele#3866 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

You know I have a theory. Maybe GGG wants to make players leave, because they already have their money and they want to reduce the community to the people who they know will stay so they can get feedback from that "core" community only, because that's the people whom they will develop and improve the game for.

Do you think, theyll made more money from core players or weekend joes ?

my big brain theory is a company that wants to make a thriving money making behemoth wants 90% of its playbase to stop playing.

becuase f the people and the contents of their wallets! said the most sane game designer ever. we dont need something people want to play to print mopney!

"

Kotolino#2642 wrote:

"

riotarchangel#2809 wrote:

Do you think, theyll made more money from core players or weekend joes ?

my big brain theory is a company that wants to make a thriving money making behemoth wants 90% of its playbase to stop playing.

becuase f the people and the contents of their wallets! said the most sane game designer ever. we dont need something people want to play to print mopney!