New SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Thread

"
lolozori wrote:
"
Exile009 wrote:
"
elesham4ever wrote:
China was buying actual tonnes worth of 'medical stuff' from countries whilst telling the world that the China Virus couldn't be transmitted human-to-human. So lets not spread propaganda about China being magnanimous member of the world community.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/second-developer-flies-82-tonnes-of-medical-supplies-to-china-20200326-p54e8n.html


So let me get this straight - China bought needed supplies when its epidemic was at its peak, and now that it's getting under control they're giving countries medical equipment for free. How exactly is this supposed to make China look bad? Contrast that with the America trying to get exclusivity for the diseases' vaccine...

https://www.businessinsider.in/science/news/trump-tried-to-poach-german-scientists-working-on-a-cure-for-coronavirus-and-offered-cash-so-the-vaccine-would-be-exclusive-to-the-usa/articleshow/74639929.cms


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSdQPtciBRg

Watch this video, make it what you want.


[Removed by Support]

Right about what exactly? It's hard to keep track of *****'s positions on anything, given how often they change. As for the rest of the video, it's just a standard r*g*t w*n* youtube host railing about the same story already linked above. The argument still makes little sense.
Last edited by Lisa_GGG#0000 on Mar 30, 2020, 1:00:41 PM
"
Exile009 wrote:
"
..Mass..<sic>


A silly idea, imo. There's a reason we have the saying, 'the bigger they are, the harder they fall.' Glib proverbs aside, there's evidence for it too - mass extinctions tend to end the stories of the biggest species more than the small. Not that I necessarily think we're heading for a mass extinction, but it is instructive - when things get real bad, the biggest collapse, while it's the small and adaptable that make it through better. Btw, the US' response to this outbreak actually makes for a perfect opportunity for an Izaro quote - "Slowness lends strength to one's enemies." :D


In an effort to be concise, since I yammer too much. :)

There's reality, then there's perception. The Market is a mixture of both. But, regardless of what motivates movement, the actual mechanism that does that is the same. So, addressing the mechanism, moving money contributing to "value" the amount and "mass" of that being done has consistent effect. It doesn't matter why something gains in value, or loses it, only that it does.

The foundations, though, are a bit different. When those are entirely based on perception, things get dangerous just like they did in 2008. I don't think the foundations, the "value," represented in the markets today are based on mostly "perception." I think they're truly, mostly, based on good fundamental value. Some adjustments do need to be made, but I think the base is strong enough to weather those and the current quarantine situations.

But, as I said earlier, I also think that "moving money" is the life-blood of commerce. It's not just the value of something that is important. IF money does not flow, things rapidly... die. IF we get to the point where the moving money from exchanges, investments, sales, loans, general commercial activity is truly lost then it would be a very serious situation. That "moving money" has a positive effect all by itself. Can it compensate for "bad things?" I think so. But, I could be wrong too - If I knew for a fact, I'd likely be smart enough to already be a bajillionaire from armchair trading.

"
Morkonan wrote:
...Indeed. And that should worry everyone...These guys should really have taken off a lot more, but a quarter of a century later they're still largely unknown - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Now_Foundation


Ah! I remember those guys. Mostly for their "Clock" which I thought was very awesome. The trouble with planning for 10,000 years though is what happens during the intervening 999 years. But, I've long been of the belief that there should be a Department of Departments somewhere that does nothing but make and implement these sorts of very long-term plans. It's important, IMO.

Unfortunately, the only evidence that can be gained to demonstrate whether or not any 10,000 year plan is conceptually valid is either gained by waiting 10,000 years or "building something." That clock? It's a tangible thing. An idea or a plan that only generates data over a period of time that spans many generation can't prove itself during the time it's being tested. (Enough of these being done, however, yields a shotgun approach who's benefit is... "mass." Somewhere, in some way, that mass-effect is thought to be enough to have a long-term positive outcome if individual projects fail.)
Last edited by Morkonan#5844 on Mar 30, 2020, 1:14:14 PM
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
u sure thats not propaganda on our side of the divide?


No, it's not "propaganda."

eg: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8160931/Spain-returns-faulty-coronavirus-testing-kits-bought-Chinese-company.html

There have been many instances of general "product returns" and quality issues, some being very real health concerns, of large runs of products from Chinese manufacturers being returned.

But, Chinese manufacturers manufacture... a lot of products. Even so, things like jewelry being made out of outrageously toxic metals, presumably because those raw materials are cheap, and pet food being poisonous and personal care items like toothpaste and make-up causing actual wounds...

I've dealt with some Chinese manufacturers. I've see what certain manufacturing segment's practices actually are and what they produce. Some standards are fine, but many do not come even close to equaling the minimum manufacturing standards of companies in other nations. They slip through the system because they're just simply not being highly scrutinized until "something bad happens."

That doesn't mean they're all bad, it just means that there are plenty of opportunities and examples for them to be bad. :)

Note: ISO certification should be a heck of a lot more widespread and, IMO, much more closely monitored by consumers of certain products.

"
..ultimately china want to be friends with the west, they want to get along with us, trade with us, co-exist peacefully with us. the west doesnt agree, especially america. america needs enemies and it will stop at nothing to make china the next one now that the old propaganda about russia has worn hollow.


I don't even know where this comes from, but I don't think it's based on any facts.

Nobody wants and nobody needs "enemies." Saying they do is... propaganda. :)

Anyway, let's stay out of that kind of line of reasoning altogether, OK? This is about the entire World against a Virus, not about individual countries making enemies out of each other. Covid-19 doesn't care about borders and doesn't care who's government its host owes allegiance to.
"
Morkonan wrote:
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
u sure thats not propaganda on our side of the divide?


No, it's not "propaganda."

eg: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8160931/Spain-returns-faulty-coronavirus-testing-kits-bought-Chinese-company.html



ive seen that article before. theres a big difference between a company in china made some dodgy testing kits and china, the government, is intentionally sending out all the ventilators and ppe equipment to the west faulty in order to seem like theyre helping but actually not help the west.

"
Spanish Health Minister Salvador Illa announced earlier this week that the country had bought $467 million in medical supplies from China, including 950 ventilators, 5.5 million testing kits, 11 million gloves and more than half a billion protective face masks.

Shenzhen Bioeasy said in a statement that the incorrect results may be a result of a failure to collect samples or use the kits correctly. The firm said it had not adequately communicated with clients how to use the kits.

The Spanish ministry said it will withdraw the kits that returned incorrect results, and would replace them with a different testing kit provided by Shenzhen Bioeasy.



so all that stuff they bought from a chinese company, some of the testing kits they thought were faulty, and the spanish ministry is replacing them with testing kits bought from... the same chinese company.

how is this china as a state intentionally sending out bad stuff to the west to pull some kind of trick on us? that is a spin.




"
Morkonan wrote:

"
..ultimately china want to be friends with the west, they want to get along with us, trade with us, co-exist peacefully with us. the west doesnt agree, especially america. america needs enemies and it will stop at nothing to make china the next one now that the old propaganda about russia has worn hollow.


I don't even know where this comes from, but I don't think it's based on any facts.

Nobody wants and nobody needs "enemies." Saying they do is... propaganda. :)



that is a naive view of the world that unfortunately is not based on the facts.
.
Last edited by elesham4ever#1687 on Mar 31, 2020, 9:01:43 AM
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:

ive seen that article before. theres a big difference between a company in china made some dodgy testing kits and china, the government, is intentionally sending out all the ventilators and ppe equipment to the west faulty in order to seem like theyre helping but actually not help the west.


"Shenzhen Bioeasy Biotechnology has not yet been licensed by the Chinese National Medical Products Administration to sell its products,” he said.

There are more than 100 Chinese companies selling coronavirus testing kits to Europe, but many are not even licensed to sell in China.


"
elesham4ever wrote:


They bought fk tonnes of supplies in January when no one was thinking epidemic --> because no one knew it could spread person to person --> because China was saying it couldn't spread person to person --> China being the only ones who had any access to the virus --> because China shut the rest of the world out.

There, now you can get it straight.


More accurate wording would be "The preliminary investigations have not found clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.”

Nobody knew any better. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, subsequent investigations found there was clear evidence of human-to-human transmission. They need documented cases of direct human-to-human transmissions. Not speculation or assumptions. Evidences, you actually need to go find it.

Then China sequenced the genome of the COVID-19 virus and share it with the rest of the world. Are they mad?
Last edited by awesome999#2945 on Mar 30, 2020, 6:24:46 PM
"
Altnaharra wrote:
"
awesome999 wrote:
Are they mad?

Their good book was already filled with another mans 'thought'
So, yes.
Attempting to play god is quite mad.

I'll throw the book at him.
How about you raise your right hand up, bitches.

Line em' up. I am the law.
Watch JD twist the cap off him and his little crazy brother next door.

H



HW

Spoiler
servedanus

the D is silent

;)


Incoherent word salad.
"
awesome999 wrote:
Spoiler
"
Altnaharra wrote:
"
awesome999 wrote:
Are they mad?

Their good book was already filled with another mans 'thought'
So, yes.
Attempting to play god is quite mad.

I'll throw the book at him.
How about you raise your right hand up, bitches.

Line em' up. I am the law.
Watch JD twist the cap off him and his little crazy brother next door.

H



HW

Spoiler
servedanus

the D is silent

;)


Incoherent word salad.


You must be new to Altna's posts lol. They're all like that. He never speaks directly or in a straightforward fashion (which is probably a smart move on these forums, given the mod policy).
Last edited by Exile009#1139 on Mar 30, 2020, 9:50:58 PM
USA seems worse off than Europe. New York and New Jersey aside, the numbers for confirmed infections per state are too even. Spread looks completely out of control and without a complete country-wide lockdown I doubt there'll be any permanent results in stopping the virus. That, or just completely quarantine the risk groups and let the virus run its course through the rest of the population.

Either way the bodies are gonna pile up.
"
awesome999 wrote:


Incoherent word salad.


Alphabet soup from incoherent word salad? Can you not spell it out?

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info