Announcing Ruthless
" Aaw crap, my mistake. Then the fact that Overflowing Chalice cannot gain charges durign the effect of any Overflowing Chalice would be a fitting unique factor for designing flask setups. No real conflict here after all. | |
This is great, so now all the stuff like AN can be dumped here and we can have the good PoE again in the main game? :o
Jokes (jokes?) aside, happy for those who will enjoy this mode. |
![]() |
God bless GGG!!! YEEES!!!! Definitely for me!
Song - " Scooter - One " <3 Death is only the beginning..
\\ Only HC Ruthless mode player. // |
![]() |
" Do any of the gems drop with some experience in acts? For example from bosses or at all. Are you not worried for players in Ruthless not changing their initial gem setups to the drops because levelling gems is so much effort before it can be called an upgrade? Now to be clear I'm not saying all gems should drop with experience. I'm talking about the rare and occasional gem drop that makes players go "Huh, I could try going with that". Just to encourage diversity, experimenting and a breath of fresh air. | |
Hope "vision" crap is going to Hard Mode.
Normal people should have fun mode in regular PoE again. You got big chance to not fcked this up again. Make your best. |
![]() |
no TY. Still waiting loot changes....
|
![]() |
We already been playing ruthless in this league.
I see no difference between this and the current status of the game. |
![]() |
i hope they let us be happy in the "normal" mode, now that they have their hard mode to play with
|
![]() |
It's good for "the vision" and vision lovers.
Now, bring back old PoE for us in the next patch. |
![]() |
" Item filters are useful for more than just filtering out bad items. You really don't want to lose something valuable because it dropped off screen. This is why racers use custom filters to add map icons and sounds for things like portal scrolls and BBG items in early acts. For that reason serious players will always use item filters even if virtually nothing drops. So if your only reason for not having a default filter is that it's not necessary, well, I would personally reconsider. Of course if that's more of a feature than a bug so to speak then carry on I guess. |
![]() |