ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

I think you don't understand man....

There is a difference between saying: the Muellers reports has facts... and showing the actual Facts that advance your opinion.


I want you to show me the actual facts.


edit: Btw even Mueller himself said there was no proof of collusion or anything criminal from Trump in his entire report. And that is fact.

There was NO proof... God Damn people are so du*b these days.... TrumpForPresident2020

well 4 years of that... still waiting for the proofs CNN has.

"

PathOfExileLatvija wrote:
There was NO proof... God Damn people are so du*b these days.... TrumpForPresident2020

This is because in American schools they no longer teach logic. But when everyone comes out of that giant trash compactor they are all attorneys. Go figure that one out.

"

diablofdb wrote:

I think you don't understand man....

There is a difference between saying: the Muellers reports has facts... and showing the actual Facts that advance your opinion.


I want you to show me the actual facts.


edit: Btw even Mueller himself said there was no proof of collusion or anything criminal from Trump in his entire report. And that is fact.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

I think you don't understand man....

There is a difference between saying: the Muellers reports has facts... and showing the actual Facts that advance your opinion.


I want you to show me the actual facts.


edit: Btw even Mueller himself said there was no proof of collusion or anything criminal from Trump in his entire report. And that is fact.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

I've asked a simple thing man... there's a whole report that is public to read. Point me the proof you have... you've been claiming it for years.

I'm only asking the believe you, just prove it. If you can't you've been lying for years.

"

diablofdb wrote:

I've asked a simple thing man... there's a whole report that is public to read. Point me the proof you have... you've been claiming it for years.

I'm only asking the believe you, just prove it. If you can't you've been lying for years.

You're objecting to him quoting a summary of the relevant facts rather than quoting the report directly? Really?

"

MrCoo1 wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

I've asked a simple thing man... there's a whole report that is public to read. Point me the proof you have... you've been claiming it for years.

I'm only asking the believe you, just prove it. If you can't you've been lying for years.

You're objecting to him quoting a summary of the relevant facts rather than quoting the report directly? Really?

I'm asking him to show a proof of his saying.

"

diablofdb wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

I think you don't understand man....

There is a difference between saying: the Muellers reports has facts... and showing the actual Facts that advance your opinion.


I want you to show me the actual facts.


edit: Btw even Mueller himself said there was no proof of collusion or anything criminal from Trump in his entire report. And that is fact.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

I've asked a simple thing man... there's a whole report that is public to read. Point me the proof you have... you've been claiming it for years.

I'm only asking the believe you, just prove it. If you can't you've been lying for years.

Okay,

First, the Mueller report said that there was no collusion. The Mueller Report did not say there was no obstruction of justice. Mueller left obstruction of justice open in the report. I know this is contrary to the lies being spread by Trump but that is just the way it is.

There are three potential obstruction of justice charges explicitly referenced and summarized in the "STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS".

· The President’s efforts to fire Mueller and to falsify evidence about that effort;

· The President’s efforts to limit the scope of Mueller’s investigation to exclude his conduct; and

· The President’s efforts to prevent witnesses from cooperating with investigators probing him and his campaign.

I copied in the summary detail for those three potential charges in an above post.

More detail than that is available in the Mueller report.

You ask for proof as if we were in seventh grade math class. The law doesn't work that way.

There is plenty of strong evidence that would lead to an indictment and multiple charges, for at least those three charges. Regarding any others, "It would be well within the purview of normal prosecutorial judgment also to charge other acts detailed in the report."

Once charges are brought then normally there would be a trial. "Every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience."

So you say that the report says: Trump tried to falsify evidence... show me. Show me where? That's what I'm asking man. I'm a man of thruth.

Show me where does it says that. It's a very simple task.

1. you made a claim.
2. I'm asking you to back that claim.
3. You back that claim.
4. I believe you.


Now show me.

edit: oh I'm going to make it easier for you, I'll tell you exactly what you need to do so it's going to be suuuuuper easy.

Just link me, to something that is DIRECTLY taken from the report and is a proof of what you're saying. No editing, no opinion, no false flag, no biased journalism, no that's what he she said. Just a simple link... A sentence would be enough.