ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

I'm surprised that none of the usual suspects are crowing about the NYT's stunning revelations about private citizen Trump's taxes from 30 years ago...

...That he had already revealed in his book, "The Art of the Comeback."

I now surrender the floor to anyone wanting to harp inaccurately on "bankruptcies" and such.

He's still the President of the United States of America. =^[.]^=

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

The unprecedented level of detail in the Mueller report regarding the "how" of the hack makes me believe it was more likely than not the GRU behind it.

There's no significant details that weren't either already available, or easy to figure out. That "Fancy Bear" was tied in with GRU 7455 was public published at least as early as October of last year:

https://nl.usembassy.gov/u-s-charges-russian-gru-officers-with-international-hacking-and-related-influence-and-disinformation-operations/

There is less detail in the report on techniques (It might be under the blacked out sections) than I have seen in previous analyses.

The data transfer rates for exfiltration that the report supposes exceeded technical capabilities at the time. The report covers its legal ass by saying that they "can't rule out" that the data was physically transferred through an intermediary.

His name was Seth Rich.

Dalai, the data Forensicator used to established data transfer speeds (assuming it's not forged, but why forge for WikiLeaks?) indicate a speed that is highly suggestive of USB3 transfer. However, USB3 can be used for many different things, including external hard drives used as permanent storage. The Mueller report details that the DNC networks were, at least initially, not directly accessible to intruders, and were accessed via VPN connection using compromised DCCC workstations. If the DNC network had the proper security, this may have been the only method to enter the network, at fairly low privilege levels. Even if I'm not sure (beyond a reasonable doubt) that things went down how CrowdStrike said, I know that this type of short-range (within the same building) network connection would have base speeds higher than USB3, but those speeds would be reduced to USB3 if using USB3 to connect to storage on the DNC end.

Or to put it more simply (and I'm embarrassed I didn't realize it until after the Mueller report), speeds suggestive of USB3 do NOT necessarily mean flash drive exfiltration. What it suggests is USB3 at some point along a data transfer path. The Forensicator speed data is completely consistent with the Mueller report's narrative of using a DCCC workstation to transfer DNC data via VPN and then zipping it at the DCCC workstation, providing the DNC data was stored on an external hard drive.

And again, that's assuming the hackers didn't forge the file timestamps. While I wonder at a motive for that, it would be doable.

Seth Rich wasn't killed execution style. He wasn't even dead when the ambulance arrived. It seems like he was mugged by mundane, nonconspiratorial muggers and decided to resist them, which is a tad strange but inconclusive. If they were assassins, they were so shit at their jobs as to beggar belief.

Overall, the case that Seth Rich was the DNC leaker is extremely weak. Given that there's a family who lost someone involved, you really should stop spreading such ugly and unsubstantiated rumors. It's unbecoming.

"

Raycheetah wrote:

I'm surprised that none of the usual suspects are crowing about the NYT's stunning revelations about private citizen Trump's taxes from 30 years ago...

...That he had already revealed in his book, "The Art of the Comeback."

I now surrender the floor to anyone wanting to harp inaccurately on "bankruptcies" and such.

He's still the President of the United States of America. =^[.]^=

The story is a reminder of how Trump thrives under pressure. He literally made an asset out of being billions in the red. He framed it as a comeback story, not only in the book but also in The Apprentice and in many TV interviews during that time. Genius.

It's also very fun to watch losers on Reddit trying to convince other losers that Trump is somehow a loser.

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

I'm surprised that none of the usual suspects are crowing about the NYT's stunning revelations about private citizen Trump's taxes from 30 years ago...

...That he had already revealed in his book, "The Art of the Comeback."

I now surrender the floor to anyone wanting to harp inaccurately on "bankruptcies" and such.

He's still the President of the United States of America. =^[.]^=

The story is a reminder of how Trump thrives under pressure. He literally made an asset out of being billions in the red. He framed it as a comeback story, not only in the book but also in The Apprentice and in many TV interviews during that time. Genius.

It's also very fun to watch losers on Reddit trying to convince other losers that Trump is somehow a loser.

Trump came through the NYC real estate crash still capable of capitalizing on the opportunities it presented, in spite of the setbacks he suffered. Seems to be doin' pretty well these days; you don't maintain your own jet aircraft on welfare checks and food stamps. =^[.]^=

"

The_Impeacher wrote:

No. You retain it with laundered Russian mob rubles.

After daddy died and Donald blew through what was left, he turned to the Kremlin mafia.

Everytime someone mention Russia:

wtf i love the 9th circuit now

"

Xavderion wrote:

wtf i love the 9th circuit now

To clarify, they lifted the injunction against the practice while the case was pending. Later, when the case is actually heard, they might keep the practice legal, or forbid it.

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

"

We are former federal prosecutors. We served under both Republican and Democratic administrations at different levels of the federal system: as line attorneys, supervisors, special prosecutors, United States Attorneys, and senior officials at the Department of Justice. The offices in which we served were small, medium, and large; urban, suburban, and rural; and located in all parts of our country.

"

Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.

"

We emphasize that these are not matters of close professional judgment. Of course, there are potential defenses or arguments that could be raised in response to an indictment of the nature we describe here. In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience.

https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1

Currently signed by 439 former federal prosecutors.

In 40 minutes or so we are now up to 459 former federal prosecutor signatures.

Now up to 527 former federal prosecutor signatures.

Now up to 650 former federal prosecutor signatures.

Now up to 735 former federal prosecutor signatures.

What these folks are saying is that in their expert opinion there are multiple potential felony charges described in the report that are NOT a close call. They say it is highly likely that if charges were brought and it was tried before a jury they clearly feel that the case beyond a reasonable doubt would be proven. We also know that Cohen is now in jail for 2 out of 3 things that he did that only benefited Trump. Meaning Trump is guilty of those crimes as well.

To the Trump fans that think that Trump has not committed felonies, you folks are out of touch with reality.

"

Turtledove wrote:

To the Trump fans that think that Trump has not committed felonies, you folks are out of touch with reality.

Point me one felony or one crime he has done... and no don't use a "CNN have proofs of it"... no show me the real proofs. Real actual proofs that could be used in court, Not that's what he she said, rumors or propaganda.


edit: incoming CNN reports of the said "bombshell" Russia collusion xD, Remember when CNN would kept using the word Bombshell and that they had every necessary proofs and they had prople who could testify and everything. And none of it turned to be truth. Oh my.


But no seriously I only ask you to prove it. Back up your words <3