[3.10] Bashtart's SPARK INQUISITOR * farming like a god! :)

"

bashtart wrote:

"

FirstGrade wrote:

Hi all I am attempting to match fully to the guide where the cold damage isn't required anymore, transiting to pure lightning although the 3.2 build with HoI was easy even at tier 11.

I'm still attempting to get my rat's nest to 3b1g sockets to put in HoT, Wrath and Enlighten. Until then, can the author or anyone familiar with the guide, guide me to my next step ? Thanks !

Hi, if you prefered the version with Herald of Ice and Call of the Brotherhood... it is still viable :) Maybe it was a mistake from me to drop it... I guess I will add it again in the guide.

LOL come on I just spend 50c to be full lightning don't do this to me.

"

FirstGrade wrote:

"

bashtart wrote:

"

FirstGrade wrote:

Hi all I am attempting to match fully to the guide where the cold damage isn't required anymore, transiting to pure lightning although the 3.2 build with HoI was easy even at tier 11.

I'm still attempting to get my rat's nest to 3b1g sockets to put in HoT, Wrath and Enlighten. Until then, can the author or anyone familiar with the guide, guide me to my next step ? Thanks !

Hi, if you prefered the version with Herald of Ice and Call of the Brotherhood... it is still viable :) Maybe it was a mistake from me to drop it... I guess I will add it again in the guide.

LOL come on I just spend 50c to be full lightning don't do this to me.

Don't worry about it... the only difference is Call of the Brotherhood and HoT instead of HoI :)

"

bashtart wrote:

Don't worry about it... the only difference is Call of the Brotherhood and HoT instead of HoI :)

Which variation would you prefer?

"

Ianree wrote:

"

bashtart wrote:

Don't worry about it... the only difference is Call of the Brotherhood and HoT instead of HoI :)

Which variation would you prefer?

I guess early on HoT + Cotb and with good gear HoI version with life on hit with spells ring (kinda expensive...) but I will test more and try to improve the build a bit more :)

My current gear's fine, not including Choir of the storms. Its definitely too expensive for me right now. My problem now is Wrath+HoT takes 75% reserve and any damage gives me 0 mana. So i'm leveling my enlighten orb now to ease that problem. Other than that, I prefer this spark one because it has more fps.. compared to shatters o/

Personally i dont like to link concentrated gem with BV, is it viable to replace it with crit damage support ???
And i did some self adjustment, im using HoI, arctic armour and clarity for more surviability. I would close HoI for bossing. Ofc i sacrificed an aura that boosts dps but my way of doing that is it recommeneded ???!

About call of the brotherhood ring, could it be replaced with Mark Of The Shaper ?? Ofc the 2nd ring has to elder based if using shaper ring
If you dont mind pls take a look to my char Amduusias :D

How do u sustain mana with this build? I just seem to keep running out of mana :/

"

jmwafu21 wrote:

How do u sustain mana with this build? I just seem to keep running out of mana :/

Either Pious Path ascendancy or mana leech on shaper glove (would be for spark only) or warlord's mark. Haven't looked at bashtart's updated tree but there may be some extra mana regen in there as well, not sure on that.

"

TheRealTuna wrote:

"

jmwafu21 wrote:

How do u sustain mana with this build? I just seem to keep running out of mana :/

Either Pious Path ascendancy or mana leech on shaper glove (would be for spark only) or warlord's mark. Haven't looked at bashtart's updated tree but there may be some extra mana regen in there as well, not sure on that.

Hm that is strange... I am about the same level 75 and have no mana problems at all... you can check my profile or go to the leveling section where I posted my stuff with lvl 74. Oh now I see... you did go for MoM... I would not use this without mana leech in your spark setup or Pious Path because otherwise it is really hard to sustain it.

So the solution is to spec out of MoM for now and get it later when you can sustain it.

>>>