69 eaters ssf no melding edit: 84 eaters now
"Wrong. LE is objectively easier because it's been designed like that from the ground up. Starting with the campaign, loot and crafting, skill and class designs, encounter designs and their general design philosophies. Not having a decade+ worth of endgame content is also an important factor. Targeted loot and accessibility for solo players is not the reason. Anyone who killed Uber Abberoth SAF(HC) in S2 can attest to this. |
![]() |
" You don't need to play SSF for that, the chats are shared anyway, you just don't need to buy or list items. Done. Easy right? " You misunderstand me, I don't mean the general difficulty, i mean the difficulty to target-farm your gg gear. Which in turn enables you to challenge those uberbosses quite "fast". Current Build: Penance Brand God build?! https://pobb.in/bO32dZtLjji5 Last edited by tsunamikun#0433 on Aug 20, 2025, 5:46:48 AM
|
![]() |
i think that the error in thinking in this situation is people thinking that because something is in the game they should be able to reliably get it, or ever get even with extreme amounts of farming.
this whole idea that if you cant just get what you want then it must not be balanced right just doesnt understand this sort of game imo. theres loot in the game that might not drop even if you played for 10,000 hours. the game is not a doll dressing simulator where the loot is a stores inventory that you buy and dress up your doll, trade doesnt even turn it into that for 99.999% of players who cant afford everything in the shop by a long way. its a game, its random loot, the idea is that stuff drops and you do your best with the stuff that drops. the idea is not that you make a shopping list and get everything on the list. if you decide you want an item and its an item you cant get then thats a lack of game knowledge from the player. the item potentially existing does not entitle a player to have it. " its very much intentionally, the vast majority of the game is intentionally balanced around finding stuff yourself. the devs openly state most players are self found players and that even trade itself has been designed to keep the balance for self found, thats why its been kept so clunky for so long. players didnt gain access to it, players have always been able to play solo self found and the majority of players have always played that way. trade is ab absolute joke. 95% of the game is not balanced for trade, with the most pathetic amount of effort you can buy gear that will destroy basically any boss in the game. almost everything that had value in trade is almost worthless because of massive buffs to the ability to find stuff ourselves. trade is not balanced, trade is an absolute joke. self found is balanced. " the goal of ssf was to allow players to have a tag that proved they had not partied or traded, it gave people a receipt that they could use to back up their bragging. it wasnt designed so that people could finally not party and not trade, people could already not party and not trade by not partying and not trading, and thats how the majority of players have always played since day 1. ssf meant that a streamer could prove they had not traded for items off stream or got boosted and people could compete in ladders and bragging against other people who could prove they were ssf. before that people like anuhart etc just put ssf in their stream title and didnt trade/party. I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :) Last edited by Snorkle_uk#0761 on Aug 20, 2025, 12:04:17 PM
|
![]() |
" What makes your argument weak is that, as you yourself mentioned, current loot is already sufficient. With the right knowledge and strategy, players don’t need mirror-tier items or top-tier uniques to succeed. Making specific items rarer serves no functional purpose because they aren’t required to beat the game. For that reason, artificially inflating playtime with ego-driven “checklists” doesn’t make the game better, it just makes it longer for the sake of length. Ruthless should be [Removed by Support].
|
![]() |