[2.6] Milky's Righteous Fire Totems [cheap, SC/HC, Shaper, UberAtziri]

I dont see a single reason why it shouldn't, except its bugged :p

some updates in the Ascendancy class section added.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi-NL9JevOxF-6W3n-a7o-w

My Youtube channel with builds, unique and mechanic discussions etc
Last edited by Milkyslice on Mar 4, 2016, 1:25:57 AM
GGG changed the wording of Tukohama.

Totems reflect fire damage when hit, earlier it was Totems deal fire dmg when hit.

Its possible that EE will work now, which would make the class even better (and require minor tree changes

edit: we can use EE as a chieftain, will update the guide later.

found severy threads about reflected dmg (hrimms, shavronnes). those dont procc ee
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi-NL9JevOxF-6W3n-a7o-w

My Youtube channel with builds, unique and mechanic discussions etc
Last edited by Milkyslice on Mar 4, 2016, 1:54:22 AM
That sounds pretty fucking awesome.

Another good thing is the tree changes are minimal.

Will wait for confirmation.

EDIT: If that's the case the build will need to pluck out one skill gem for Lightning Trap correct?
Last edited by elitedesolator on Mar 4, 2016, 1:51:21 AM
That will be awesome then making EE viable again. I would love to see where the wording changed for this but in 13 hours it will be live anyway.

I just did a yolo atziri run just now with a 5L RF totem, low level gems, 3k armour, and 3k life despite a lag spike killing me on trio it seemed fine and its crazy that with asc dropping its just going to get stronger ;)
yes thsts possible. In 2.1 i only used VLT for ee because 15sec ee uptime with 3 traps is most of the time enough. gemswap is also possible.

I am currently at work, will update everything later. Its easier to poe.url, make a tree and edit the thread on a pc :P

nowadays ice trap will be a better choice than lightning trap (aoe coverage with aoe nodes)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi-NL9JevOxF-6W3n-a7o-w

My Youtube channel with builds, unique and mechanic discussions etc
Last edited by Milkyslice on Mar 4, 2016, 2:00:18 AM
"
Milkyslice wrote:
yes thsts possible. In 2.1 i only used VLT for ee because 15sec ee uptime with 3 traps is most of the time enough. gemswap is also possible.

I am currently at work, will update everything later.

nowadays ice trap will be a better choice than lightning trap (aoe coverage with aoe nodes)


Wait so have Ice Trap + Vaal Lightning Trap?

Or am I confused?
Vaal Lightning Trap is on most maps enough. exception was core and uber so far in 2.1 :p

If you wanna procc EE more often use Ice Trap in addition to it.

Changing one support for icespear is possible or using a unset ring.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi-NL9JevOxF-6W3n-a7o-w

My Youtube channel with builds, unique and mechanic discussions etc
Last edited by Milkyslice on Mar 4, 2016, 2:03:29 AM
If I don't get a good unset ring and have no spare spots, I'll probably just switch out VLT for LT during Atziri and Core.

Just because Ice Trap is green.

EDIT: Final tree with EE.

https://www.pathofexile.com/passive-skill-tree/AAAAAwEAxthggFhjJvMWCz38E6V7s4zPF4z2SM9nXz8UIO8OUEfkUWebrj7GrjwtEMyDX4PMK7a3PoxGQYf-CviTnL756PJF2L0NH2h0gsc64TWSPCjaYij6plf-jxhWmK24k03jHNzr7o8apwgy0Zrg2CSPRkVHRZ1WSB0UUfubocBmU1L60hJpzRYYavfXBLM8BRZvZp4XLxccHxh4L6yYogCf3-98JKrjanIPWOVk53F5fOU6WPAfNumUb1nzwxNV1lgHVcZmVJ8-GjhaK4Ckg9st0pBVo_IEBycvTLOXldAfUlPv6z1fl_Q=
Last edited by elitedesolator on Mar 4, 2016, 2:21:47 AM
This would be my choice

some more regen and armour in it, but tastes are different. I will change the guide in a few hours... pic, tree and ee stuff
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi-NL9JevOxF-6W3n-a7o-w

My Youtube channel with builds, unique and mechanic discussions etc
Last edited by Milkyslice on Mar 4, 2016, 2:31:21 AM
Yeah slight variation. Pathing is very similar.

BTW Milky your build is at 115 points excluding Ascendancy. If we go Oak All Oak that means the tree is for level 94. Might be good to cut down to level 85-87 build instead. Less complainers.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info