"
Just like you can't bring any valid arguments? Or answer simple questions? Oh the irony.
I am doing the part. Unlike you I am not trying to brush people off. It's not my fault that you can't read or something. I'm done talking to you. Talking to you is like talking to wall.
My 0.4 leaguestarter: Lightning Spear Amazon
https://poe.ninja/poe2/profile/default_mp3-9394/vaal/character/fava_amazonls Last edited by default_mp3#9394 on Apr 22, 2026, 5:56:55 AM
|
Posted bydefault_mp3#9394on Apr 22, 2026, 5:55:24 AM
|
|
if there is an option about anything that doesnt unbalance inbetween, its fine. if you dont accept it, what is the reason? so, not accepting the OPTION that doesnt hurt in between 2 selection is clearly MORONIC
there is way named ABC
there is another way named XYZ
You cant force me to go only ABC if there is XYZ way is same if they are equal to raech my destination.
ABC way is if rocky, boring.
XYZ way is not rocky nor boring or less boring.
thats it! we are heading to same destination without having any + benefits.
GO SELECT ABC WAY! I DONT CARE!
But being against to build XYZ road is kinda... even more than moronic, sounds like almost 'racist'.
Last edited by arkanie#2558 on Apr 22, 2026, 6:07:21 AM
|
Posted byarkanie#2558on Apr 22, 2026, 6:02:52 AM
|
"
"
Just like you can't bring any valid arguments? Or answer simple questions? Oh the irony.
I am doing the part. Unlike you I am not trying to brush people off. It's not my fault that you can't read or something. I'm done talking to you. Talking to you is like talking to wall.
Sure you are. Let me remind you.
"
"
"
There is no gatekeeping. It's literally the game.
No. It's literally YOU SPECIFICALLY. YOU acting like ppl should not have the opinion which is why the feedback section exists in the first place. "Don't like, don't play" "Change the game" it's coming from YOU SPECIFICALLY. It's clear gatekeeping from your side. The developers desicions are meant to be discussed, while YOU just blatantly defending those desicions by trying shut the conversations down. So in conclusion it looks like this: "Devs made a decision, you don't like, don't play it. You should change the game it's not for you. No opinions allowed." That is CLEAR GATEKEEPING.
You doing this not the first time at this point. Yet you have ZERO good arguments to write here to explain why ppl opnions are wrong.
Do you even know what gatekeeping is?
Tell us please, for how long has this been requested, poe1 included?
Still waiting for your valid arguments and answer to my question.
Btw: "I don't want to play the campaign" is not a valid argument.
Last edited by bloomhead#3858 on Apr 22, 2026, 6:27:37 AM
|
Posted bybloomhead#3858on Apr 22, 2026, 6:27:05 AMOn Probation
|
"
Btw: "I don't want to play the campaign" is not a valid argument.
I don't want to play the campaign is a valid argument.
If a player doesn’t enjoy a game mode, they are justified in not playing it.
I don’t enjoy the campaign.
Therefore, I don’t want to play the campaign.
A valid argument is any argument where the conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the conclusion is subjective, like a personal preference.
|
Posted byarkanie#2558on Apr 22, 2026, 6:35:42 AM
|
"
"
Btw: "I don't want to play the campaign" is not a valid argument.
I don't want to play the campaign is a valid argument.
If a player doesn’t enjoy a game mode, they are justified in not playing it.
I don’t enjoy the campaign.
Therefore, I don’t want to play the campaign.
A valid argument is any argument where the conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the conclusion is subjective, like a personal preference.
The campaign is the game. So no, it's not a valid argument.
And just btw:
It doesn’t at least not as it stands.
The sentence “I don’t want to play the campaign in Path of Exile 2” is just a bare conclusion. There are no premises given, so there’s nothing for the conclusion to “follow from.” Without premises, you don’t have an argument at all, just a statement of preference.
Last edited by bloomhead#3858 on Apr 22, 2026, 6:55:46 AM
|
Posted bybloomhead#3858on Apr 22, 2026, 6:43:46 AMOn Probation
|
"
"
"
Btw: "I don't want to play the campaign" is not a valid argument.
I don't want to play the campaign is a valid argument.
If a player doesn’t enjoy a game mode, they are justified in not playing it.
I don’t enjoy the campaign.
Therefore, I don’t want to play the campaign.
A valid argument is any argument where the conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the conclusion is subjective, like a personal preference.
The campaign is the game. So no, it's not a valid argument.
And just btw:
It doesn’t at least not as it stands.
The sentence “I don’t want to play the campaign in Path of Exile 2” is just a bare conclusion. There are no premises given, so there’s nothing for the conclusion to “follow from.” Without premises, you don’t have an argument at all, just a statement of preference.
I am out of words to waste
|
Posted byarkanie#2558on Apr 22, 2026, 7:00:13 AM
|
"
"
"
I don't want to play the campaign is a valid argument.
If a player doesn’t enjoy a game mode, they are justified in not playing it.
I don’t enjoy the campaign.
Therefore, I don’t want to play the campaign.
A valid argument is any argument where the conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the conclusion is subjective, like a personal preference.
The campaign is the game. So no, it's not a valid argument.
And just btw:
It doesn’t at least not as it stands.
The sentence “I don’t want to play the campaign in Path of Exile 2” is just a bare conclusion. There are no premises given, so there’s nothing for the conclusion to “follow from.” Without premises, you don’t have an argument at all, just a statement of preference.
I am out of words to waste
Hoisted by your own petard.
|
Posted bybloomhead#3858on Apr 22, 2026, 7:02:01 AMOn Probation
|
|
if there is an option about anything that doesnt unbalance inbetween, its fine. if you dont accept it, what is the reason? so, not accepting the OPTION that doesnt hurt in between 2 selection is clearly MORONIC
there is way named ABC
there is another way named XYZ
You cant force me to go only ABC if there is XYZ way is same if they are equal to raech my destination.
ABC way is if rocky, boring.
XYZ way is not rocky nor boring or less boring.
thats it! we are heading to same destination without having any + benefits.
GO SELECT ABC WAY! I DONT CARE!
But being against to build XYZ road is kinda... even more than moronic, sounds like almost 'racist'.
|
Posted byarkanie#2558on Apr 22, 2026, 7:06:42 AM
|
"
if there is an option about anything that doesnt unbalance inbetween, its fine. if you dont accept it, what is the reason? so, not accepting the OPTION that doesnt hurt in between 2 selection is clearly MORONIC
there is way named ABC
there is another way named XYZ
You cant force me to go only ABC if there is XYZ way is same if they are equal to raech my destination.
ABC way is if rocky, boring.
XYZ way is not rocky nor boring or less boring.
thats it! we are heading to same destination without having any + benefits.
GO SELECT ABC WAY! I DONT CARE!
But being against to build XYZ road is kinda... even more than moronic, sounds like almost 'racist'.
Oh, the racism card, because you don't get to play the way you want.
I am out of words to waste.
|
Posted bybloomhead#3858on Apr 22, 2026, 7:10:32 AMOn Probation
|
|
actually, the immature people jumping in to defend current system blindly and without any valid reason are only helping this forum post get more attention. So at least you are feeding the fire, thanks for that :)
|
Posted byarkanie#2558on Apr 22, 2026, 7:15:18 AM
|
