Steam is going balistic

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

It seems I'm able to debate a dozen people or so by myself and win. Guess that makes me a troll.

lol you ain't winning bro.
The fact that you are the only one holding a "no" opinion when we are discussing whether there is a majority consus on whether the reception is good or not directly proves you wrong.
Unless you are actually trolling of course in which case I guess you could consider that a win if you really wanted ;)
You could go much harder than that though

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

Give me a constructive criticism right now.

lmao in that demanding tone
Maybe if you said "pretty please" you silly keyboard warrior
stop posting already

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

We all know the recent reviews are negative. Doesn't prove that 0.2 was a bad patch, neither does it prove 0.2 is responsible for the player decline that has been going on since before 0.2 was implemented, neither proves that your feedback and demands for the game will make it a better game, neither proves that the majority of players dislike 0.2.

And you can't prove the opposite either because it's only evidence and not proof.

Seems we are in a pickle then. But I'm not the one shouting "Do what I say or the game will fail if you don't. I have demands and you better make them become reality! This game is doomed and thus you need to abandon everything and make it more like I want it!", am I?

"

PushkickInMain#4096 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

Give me a constructive criticism right now.

lmao in that demanding tone
Maybe if you said "pretty please" you silly keyboard warrior
stop posting already

I'll send you feetpics.

I mean, if bro actually enjoyed the game that much he'd probably be playing it right now instead of spending most of his sunday arguing pointlessly over the forums, but oh well, different strokes I guess.

Gratz to all of those who are here to Win something. GG to you.

For the rest https://imgur.com/a/WGlEE96

Overall feedback of those who have played this game for 100h+.
Feedback of those who got into maps and saw the game for what it is atm.

"

LFA01#0120 wrote:

I mean, if bro actually enjoyed the game that much he'd probably be playing it right now instead of spending most of his sunday arguing pointlessly over the forums, but oh well, different strokes I guess.

This is probably some kind of fallacy. But I don't know which one. I should really learn that stuff.

No, I'm here, because I fear you might put some collaborative effort into destroying a game that I like behind my back, while I'm playing it, with your politics and fallacies. That's why I'm here and not playing, rn. Also words are fun, sometimes more fun than videogames.

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

If this was a real debate and there was a moderator of some kind I'd have won a long time ago.

How?
All the facts indicate that the game has been poorly received.
Over 600,000 players never even bothered to come back for 0.2
And of the 250,000 that did return, the vast majority jumped ship less than 2 weeks in.

The majority of the recent reviews are negative.

Public opinion on the forums is entirely negative with the exception of 2 trolls who offer no facts or evidence to support their position.

People aren't demanding "make the game the way I like it or the game will fail" They are detailing the reasons why people don't like the game, and correctly pointing out that a game without players *IS* a failed game.

"

JarlaxleDaerthe#2435 wrote:

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

If this was a real debate and there was a moderator of some kind I'd have won a long time ago.

How?
All the facts indicate that the game has been poorly received.
Over 600,000 players never even bothered to come back for 0.2
And of the 250,000 that did return, the vast majority jumped ship less than 2 weeks in.

The majority of the recent reviews are negative.

Public opinion on the forums is entirely negative with the exception of 2 trolls who offer no facts or evidence to support their position.

People aren't demanding "make the game the way I like it or the game will fail" They are detailing the reasons why people don't like the game, and correctly pointing out that a game without players *IS* a failed game.

Well the game is in early access, so it's not polished. And a game that's not polished is maybe 50% of the fun that it ought to be. It's like if you played Overwatch and it wasn't balanced, making half the heroes redundant. It's just not acceptable, except of course, if it is early access. Now there can be many other reasons for this, for example a strong competition in this area and we all know there's lots of that.

In my opinion the game did better than expected, with I think one million copies sold. And it's not even released, so there will be more people coming, hopefully, when that's the case. The game isn't failed, it's in it's testing phase. It's like a beta. Player retention doesn't mean as much as if it was released.

"

Naharez#3496 wrote:

"

LFA01#0120 wrote:

I mean, if bro actually enjoyed the game that much he'd probably be playing it right now instead of spending most of his sunday arguing pointlessly over the forums, but oh well, different strokes I guess.

This is probably some kind of fallacy. But I don't know which one. I should really learn that stuff.

No, I'm here, because I fear you might put some collaborative effort into destroying a game that I like behind my back, while I'm playing it, with your politics and fallacies. That's why I'm here and not playing, rn. Also words are fun, sometimes more fun than videogames.

It's a conspiracy bro.
As a matter of fact, believe it or not but we're actually doing it just to spite you personally, behind your back and all.
Jokes aside, eventually you should just stop and move on my man.