Rename POE 2 so it is not associated with real POE.

"
rob_korn#1745 wrote:

I couldn't care less about the main point,


Then don't quote him to spark your own tangent if you don't care about what he wrote lol. That's an awful way to contribute to the conversation.

Have the common decency to respond to the post you quoted, or don't post. You are doing exactly what you complained about in the first sentence of your last post. Yet he wasn't.

If you have no interest in discussion, no interest in this topic, no interest in reading the posts you are responding to, no interest in learning the context before writing.....perhaps you are in the wrong place.
Starting anew....with PoE 2
Last edited by cowmoo275#3095 on Dec 28, 2025, 1:33:32 PM
My god, the blinkers are big on this one...

"
Then don't quote him to spark your own tangent if you don't care about what he wrote lol.

That's no tangent, he tries to invalidate an extreme opinion with the other extreme, and that's exactly what I explained. The conclusion can be right, the argument is not.

"
Have the common decency to respond to the post you quoted, or don't post. You are doing exactly what you complained about in the first sentence of your last post. Yet he wasn't.


Did you really read ? :
"
me wrote:
The "main" topic is irrelevant and not a discussion anyway. PoE is owned by GGG, GGG is making PoE2, there is no discussion to be had. I have no interest discussing why a pot is called a pot with OP.

I agree with snorkle regarding the fact that GGG do whatever they want, because PoE is a GGG property, so OP has no point.
AGAIN, my point is somewhere else, despite agreeing with snorkle's conclusion, saying PoE1 is Jonathan's is factually wrong, and I explained why. And that's why I quoted him. Off my back, thanks.

"
perhaps you are in the wrong place.

Am I ? I get that you want to be angry at people, thus why you jumped at me despite not being the one you thought I was. And then the irony of repeating about me not reading. Meanwhile :

"
**Edited because I mistakenly called the wrong person out**
+1
POG, Path of Gambling
WAAAAAA

You have to actually play the game. I want my game to be spreadsheet game where I afk and watch netflix as my character zooms across the map blasting everything while I hardly pay attention. WAAAA
"
hboi#6131 wrote:
WAAAAAA

You have to actually play the game. I want my game to be spreadsheet game where I afk and watch netflix as my character zooms across the map blasting everything while I hardly pay attention. WAAAA


Everything you just said is peak gaming for me. Except for the waaahs.
1. "Meaningful Combat" Is Anti-ARPG: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3884793
2. Mechanical Skill (Dodgeroll) and Intellectual Skill: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3883605
3. Some PoE2 Numbers and Charts: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3896886
Last edited by nagisanzeninzz#2697 on Dec 29, 2025, 9:55:45 PM
"
"
hboi#6131 wrote:
WAAAAAA

You have to actually play the game. I want my game to be spreadsheet game where I afk and watch netflix as my character zooms across the map blasting everything while I hardly pay attention. WAAAA


Everything you just said is peak gaming for me. Except for the waaahs.


Yeah, exactly. This is whats wrong with modern day arpg community. Just want a second monitor game.
"
hboi#6131 wrote:
"
"
hboi#6131 wrote:
WAAAAAA

You have to actually play the game. I want my game to be spreadsheet game where I afk and watch netflix as my character zooms across the map blasting everything while I hardly pay attention. WAAAA


Everything you just said is peak gaming for me. Except for the waaahs.


Yeah, exactly. This is whats wrong with modern day arpg community. Just want a second monitor game.


Sounds fun.

Remind me how is fun wrong again?
1. "Meaningful Combat" Is Anti-ARPG: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3884793
2. Mechanical Skill (Dodgeroll) and Intellectual Skill: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3883605
3. Some PoE2 Numbers and Charts: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/3896886
Last edited by nagisanzeninzz#2697 on Dec 30, 2025, 4:06:00 AM
"


Remind me how is fun wrong again?

Most people would consider fun to be something engaging, youre describing something mind-numbing and not engaging as fun. I'd say your kind of "fun" is pretty niche and of low demand in the broader gaming community.
Last edited by Frozendare#3622 on Dec 30, 2025, 4:46:34 AM
"
"


Remind me how is fun wrong again?

Most people would consider fun to be something engaging, youre describing something mind-numbing and not engaging as fun. I'd say your kind of "fun" is pretty niche and of low demand in the broader gaming community.


But boss fights in PoE are more engaging than in PoE2? There is literally no shot PoE2 players will ever one phase Ubers in PoE, I did that with ease on Uber Arbiter. Could even watch my second monitor while doing so.

So where is the engaging PoE2 everyone babbling about?
"
H3rB1985#0551 wrote:
There is literally no shot PoE2 players will ever one phase Ubers in PoE


Oh? What's so special about POE1 players compared to poe2 players? What does "One phase ubers" mean? It requires great reaction times and mechanical skill? What percentage of PoE1 players actually do it?

Engaging combat is not just about bossfights, most of your time spent playing the game is doing maps over and over, that should be engaging.

But in terms of boss design both games have flaws, and i certainly not gonna judge based on "Ubers". All bosses should aim to be engaging, even campaign ones. If i stomp them then its a disappointment

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info