The issue with gold and the current market, and Ange.

"

Oinkaments#6390 wrote:

Imagine GGG reading this lol. "Bro I didn't really meant what I asked for, I was just here to argue for the sake of it"

No one asked for anything. You're the one interpreting it that way and decided to vomit a wall of text instead of following those words of wisdom

"

iHiems#0168 wrote:

No one asked for anything. You're the one interpreting it that way and decided to vomit a wall of text instead of following those words of wisdom

My assumptions were correct when I said the forums were a troll hideout. It's hard to be mad at this kind of gaslighting becase you self reported:

"

iHiems#0168 wrote:

Honestly, I would be in favor of removing player to player trade at this point

No. Please keep gold cost. Consider increasing it.

"

If you remove that then a new 3rd party market will emerge. There will be ascendancy services sold by the RMT firm and such

Already exists. So basically without something to limit it poe 1 & 2 are psuedo pay to win, and that is ok? Also, if other games have done successful anonymous trade, and a carry is just another trade, why couldn't be anonymous as well? It is not like if your in a guild one of your guild mates who does such things is going to charge you. So if someone is just putting out that they want to help carry but need a div to motivate them, why would I need to know their real tag? They could be showing up as just another merc for all it matters.

End-league when you are just trading more than playing it is probably annoying, maybe they could make it so the costs are higher in the beginning and by the time the league is about to end they are close to 0.

There is the opposite argument though, gold is not really hard to get, gold gambling is not good late game unless its on researchers strongbox, and if you played a lot you can probably trade for everything you'd want.

"

No. Please keep gold cost. Consider increasing it.

And here I thought I was the only one...