SEXY SKINS - POE2 LORE ALLOWS IT - NO ARGUMENT AGAINST IT!

"
"
could it be something to do with her culture? They are like strong independent warrior women that can do whatever they like aren't they?
Where are all the other women dressing like this throughout the game?


Ahh, culture. You do know that the sorceres actually stems from the same culture as Asala? And I would argue she is also a strong and Independent woman. Or do you have to be a warrior to fight half naked? I would argumente that warrior most often wear closed armor, while witches and sorceress usually wear less, because it hinders them to cast magic.

I mean, besides the lore, look at her artwork:



She is depictured as an attractive woman that doesn't wear much. GGG even draw her with her leg raised, kinda making it a sexy pose. Or do you see her raising her leg ingame while casting stuff? So I guess GGG does know how to draw a sexy character that still has dignity.


Leg raised = sexual lol. Bro, you sound like you are typing with one hand.
It's like you're saying you saw a girl walking down the street yesterday wearing revealing clothing so now EVERY girl you know should wear revealing clothing haha okay if this is how you see the world I'm not gonna condemn you
"


Leg raised = sexual lol. Bro, you sound like you are typing with one hand.
It's like you're saying you saw a girl walking down the street yesterday wearing revealing clothing so now EVERY girl you know should wear revealing clothing haha okay if this is how you see the world I'm not gonna condemn you


At least it's clear you are not really interested in a discussion. You come up with an argument (Asala half naked because culture = strong independent woman), I have a valid counter argument (sorcereress is from the same culture, also depictured in a sexy pose and revealing clothes on her artwork and she certainly is an independent strong woman herself) and all you can come up with is: "lol"

And yes, no character ingame does a pose like this when casting magic or doing something. I mean, in what kind of situation would you do a pose like that when doing something? She literally wears a skirt with a cutout and OF COURSE she has to raise the leg on the side with the cutout, so that her leg stands out... If you think that's an absolute normal pose you do in your daily life, then I really wonder what kind of life you're living...

This is a pose you would only see in photoshootings with models and GGG chose exactly this pose. And lets not forget that she also pushes out her chest in the picture, emphasizing her female figure even more. GGG knew, what they were doing when painting this. They could've gone with something more natural befitting a character casting magic. But they didn't, for obvious reasons.
Last edited by AceNightfire#0980 on Oct 9, 2025, 11:19:06 PM
"
"


Leg raised = sexual lol. Bro, you sound like you are typing with one hand.
It's like you're saying you saw a girl walking down the street yesterday wearing revealing clothing so now EVERY girl you know should wear revealing clothing haha okay if this is how you see the world I'm not gonna condemn you


At least it's clear you are not really interested in a discussion. You come up with an argument (Asala half naked because culture = strong independent woman), I have a valid counter argument (sorcereress is from the same culture, also depictured in a sexy pose and revealing clothes on her artwork and she certainly is an independent strong woman herself) and all you can come up with is: "lol"

And yes, no character ingame does a pose like this when casting magic or doing something. I mean, in what kind of situation would you do a pose like that when doing something? She literally wears a skirt with a cutout and OF COURSE she has to raise the leg on the side with the cutout, so that her leg stands out... If you think that's an absolute normal pose you do in your daily life, then I really wonder what kind of life you're living...

This is a pose you would only see in photoshootings with models and GGG chose exactly this pose. And lets not forget that she also pushes out her chest in the picture, emphasizing her female figure even more. GGG knew, what they were doing when painting this. They could've gone with something more natural befitting a character casting magic. But they didn't, for obvious reasons.


she is harnessing strong magic with both hands, one leg higher than other potentially to better stabilize herself in some way. You're right she looks attractive here and if you wanna see this is some kind of pseudo porn you have the right to do that
"


she is harnessing strong magic with both hands, one leg higher than other potentially to better stabilize herself in some way. You're right she looks attractive here and if you wanna see this is some kind of pseudo porn you have the right to do that


So if harnessing strong magic with both hands require you to get into a certain stable position like this, why don't we see this ingame? I can tell you: Because it isn't. Ingame you see the sorceres casually walking around WHILE casting magic. And even when casting magic that stops you from moving, she certainly doesn't raise a leg.

Also nice how you again and again try to derail the topic into pornography. No one he is talking about that kind of stuff. We just want nice, aesthetic skins that are allowed to have a reasonable amount of sexiness to them.
"
"


she is harnessing strong magic with both hands, one leg higher than other potentially to better stabilize herself in some way. You're right she looks attractive here and if you wanna see this is some kind of pseudo porn you have the right to do that


So if harnessing strong magic with both hands require you to get into a certain stable position like this, why don't we see this ingame? I can tell you: Because it isn't. Ingame you see the sorceres casually walking around WHILE casting magic. And even when casting magic that stops you from moving, she certainly doesn't raise a leg.

Also nice how you again and again try to derail the topic into pornography. No one he is talking about that kind of stuff. We just want nice, aesthetic skins that are allowed to have a reasonable amount of sexiness to them.


You just want nice, aesthetics skins in game that you will never see in a cut scene or portrayed like the pictures yet you keep sharing the same artwork over and over as examples for your argument.

The ingame models to not strike poses because the game itself is not inherently designed to excite gooners like yourself. It is a dark fantasy game that just so happens to have some examples of revealing skin, mostly notably through artwork which the majority of players don't even see in full.
"
The ingame models to not strike poses because the game itself is not inherently designed to excite gooners like yourself. It is a dark fantasy game that just so happens to have some examples of revealing skin, mostly notably through artwork which the majority of players don't even see in full.


Ah I see. It's a dark-fantasy game, yet it offers ingame models like Asala, Atziri and Diamora that are clearly emphasized with prominent female traits like huge breasts and up to no clothes covering them. On top of these ingame models, we have some aesthetic artworks of characters that show how GGG envisions these characters. So we have both: ingame models and artworks. Like I wrote in my OP: These skins are part of PoE2 lore, if you want it or not.

Also: Are characters not allowed to look sexy in a dark-fantasy world? I wonder...
Last edited by AceNightfire#0980 on Oct 10, 2025, 1:04:17 AM
"
"
The ingame models to not strike poses because the game itself is not inherently designed to excite gooners like yourself. It is a dark fantasy game that just so happens to have some examples of revealing skin, mostly notably through artwork which the majority of players don't even see in full.


Ah I see. It's a dark-fantasy game, yet it offers ingame models like Asala, Atziri and Diamora that are clearly with emphasized prominent female traits like huge breasts and up to no clothes covering them. On top of these ingame models, we have some aesthetic artworks of characters that show how GGG envisions these characters. Also: Are characters not allowed to look sexy in a dark-fantasy world? I wonder...



Oh you so you don't want nice, aesthetic skins you want SEXY skins?
Bro, you're not fooling anyone. I'm not even strictly against your argument I just think its funny watching you go through the mental gymnastics of why undressing all the females is okay
"
Oh you so you don't want nice, aesthetic skins you want SEXY skins?
Bro, you're not fooling anyone. I'm not even strictly against your argument I just think its funny watching you go through the mental gymnastics of why undressing all the females is okay


I consider the outfit from Asala "sexy". What that word means is probably up to very individual tastes. For some, seeing someone nude is "sexy", for others it may be "lingerie" and for me, sexy means clothing that emphasize the female figure instead of completely hiding it, like most MTX do. I said multiple times it doesn't even have to be as revealing as Asalas outfit and I also gave AI generated skins as an example, even if they look very generic. Surely you won't argue that these AI generated skins are considered "undressing all the females".
"
"
Oh you so you don't want nice, aesthetic skins you want SEXY skins?
Bro, you're not fooling anyone. I'm not even strictly against your argument I just think its funny watching you go through the mental gymnastics of why undressing all the females is okay


I consider the outfit from Asala "sexy". What that word means is probably up to very individual tastes. For some, seeing someone nude is "sexy", for others it may be "lingerie" and for me, sexy means clothing that emphasize the female figure instead of completely hiding it, like most MTX do. I said multiple times it doesn't even have to be as revealing as Asalas outfit and I also gave AI generated skins as an example, even if they look very generic. Surely you won't argue that these AI generated skins are considered "undressing all the females".


You are strongly advocating for removing clothing from female skins, so yes I will argue that. Have you made an argument for male skins or is it just the female skins you are trying to make revealing?
"
"
"
Oh you so you don't want nice, aesthetic skins you want SEXY skins?
Bro, you're not fooling anyone. I'm not even strictly against your argument I just think its funny watching you go through the mental gymnastics of why undressing all the females is okay


I consider the outfit from Asala "sexy". What that word means is probably up to very individual tastes. For some, seeing someone nude is "sexy", for others it may be "lingerie" and for me, sexy means clothing that emphasize the female figure instead of completely hiding it, like most MTX do. I said multiple times it doesn't even have to be as revealing as Asalas outfit and I also gave AI generated skins as an example, even if they look very generic. Surely you won't argue that these AI generated skins are considered "undressing all the females".


You are strongly advocating for removing clothing from female skins, so yes I will argue that. Have you made an argument for male skins or is it just the female skins you are trying to make revealing?


Like I said above: I'm open for more options and more viarity. I definitely would play a warrior in a conan like barbarian skin, muscles fully revealed. I mean, again: the artwork and ingame model of the warrior goes that way already anyway:





So some cool male skins in that direction wouldn't be bad at all. And if they add male (or female) skins that I dont like, I dont have to buy them or look at them anyway. It's simple as that, since it's entirely optional.
Last edited by AceNightfire#0980 on Oct 10, 2025, 5:22:00 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info