ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"

The_Reporter wrote:

IMO, he has it all. The conspiracy indictments won't be handed down until the very last of them are indicted on the "process" (hehe) crimes.

Daily reminder that asking someone to ask someone to ask someone to ask someone when the next email drop is coming is not illegal and thus not indictable.

"

鬼殺し wrote:

Something I find interesting about the dregs of the alt-right: they still use such overtly sexual language as slang for things that have nothing to do with sex. From 'cuck' to 'blueballed', it's almost like they can only read the world and communicate through the most primal means, a scenario where the sexually successful are the #winners and the sexually unsuccessful are losers. 'Grab em by the pussy' certainly does set a certain tone I guess.

But everyone else knows it for what it is, this incessant bent towards sexually-charged language to categorise things: juvenile and insecure.

It is interesting. It's like they've lost their humanity and become neanderthals.

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

The_Reporter wrote:

IMO, he has it all. The conspiracy indictments won't be handed down until the very last of them are indicted on the "process" (hehe) crimes.

Daily reminder that asking someone to ask someone to ask someone to ask someone when the next email drop is coming is not illegal and thus not indictable.

"NO COLLUSION!" Where have I seen that before? Wasn't it in many Trump tweets? Maybe I don't understand what those words mean?

NO- not any
COLLUSION- A secret agreement for an illegal purpose; conspiracy.

conspiracy- The act of two or more persons, called conspirators, working secretly to obtain some goal, usually understood with negative connotations.

Like asking someone something especially if it is about stolen property revealing said stolen property to illegaly influence an election. With some someone's being Russian and some someone's being from the Trump campaign?

Does that help in your understanding as to how someone talking to someone might be illegal and indictable?

"

鬼殺し wrote:

I'd heard about this but jeeze, seeing it is another thing altogether.

Where is his Trump Tattoo? You can't be a hardcore Trump supporter without one.

"

鬼殺し wrote:

Something I find interesting about the dregs of the alt-right: they still use such overtly sexual language as slang for things that have nothing to do with sex. From 'cuck' to 'blueballed', it's almost like they can only read the world and communicate through the most primal means, a scenario where the sexually successful are the #winners and the sexually unsuccessful are losers. 'Grab em by the pussy' certainly does set a certain tone I guess.

But everyone else knows it for what it is, this incessant bent towards sexually-charged language to categorise things: juvenile and insecure.

First off, you two don't even understand what the alt-right is or what they believe. Xav certainly isn't one of them.

Second, it's not so simple as "that which is basic and primal is the immature and subhumanand that which is disconnected from these is enlightened." The farthest fringes of leftist sexual politics deny the biological realities of our bodies to such an absurd extent that it is like adults playing make-believe where they identify as something other than human (sometimes literally, e.g. otherkin). I don't think there are very many people using terms like "cuck" and "blueball" who are unaware that they're being a bit crude, perhaps even temporarily oversexualized to the point of irony (which is, if course, lost on the humorless), but there seem to be a lot of people who are thoroughly and unironically committed to refusing to acknowledge biological gender differences and the natural human drive to sexually reproduce.

Are we more than our biological impulses? I would certainly hope so! But we aren't entirely without them, either. It's absurd that this latter point is becoming increasingly controversial to mention.

"

鬼殺し wrote:

Also, read about Stone's sexual swinging and *actual cuckold fetish*. It's great stuff. This guy was a contemporary of Roy Cohn, who famously 'was not gay, he just liked to have sex with other men'. That was back in the 80s, when AIDS was considered a 'gay' disease, to the point where it was originally called GRID: Gay-Related Immune Deficiency.

The good old days...

Stone's a really interesting character that I feel like nobody has actually read about. He self-describes as a libertine in the libertarian movement, with all that that entails. Loves swinging, drugs, dressing flamboyantly, loves being reckless and loud and lies all the time. He wants nothing more than to be on TV and have people keep his name on their lips.

Deep down he probably appreciates that the FBI put on a hilarious show of force to arrest him, and I honestly wouldn't even put it past him to have called CNN himself to get it filmed. I wonder if he even ever talked to Assange or if it's just yet more bullshit from him to improve his Bad Dude (tm) image.

---

Since we're in the "wild speculation" phase, I'm gonna guess that he gets 2 months in prison, and then milks it for the rest of his life.

---

Meanwhile in relevant news, Venezeula is in the final stages of "true socialism has never been tried", and has anyone seen Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

"

pneuma wrote:

has anyone seen Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

"

Makillda wrote:

"

pneuma wrote:

has anyone seen Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

That's rude. Funny but rude.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"NO COLLUSION!" Where have I seen that before? Wasn't it in many Trump tweets? Maybe I don't understand what those words mean?

NO- not any
COLLUSION- A secret agreement for an illegal purpose; conspiracy.

conspiracy- The act of two or more persons, called conspirators, working secretly to obtain some goal, usually understood with negative connotations.

Like asking someone something especially if it is about stolen property revealing said stolen property to illegaly influence an election. With some someone's being Russian and some someone's being from the Trump campaign?

Does that help in your understanding as to how someone talking to someone might be illegal and indictable?

The biggest case of IANAL I've seen in a while. And no, that's nothing Mike Pence would zap you for.