Holy Flame Totem
|
This is an extremely interesting option.
Maybe the damage effectiveness should influence those chances (not 1 to 1)? Zaanus:
Global chat: Mechanics for A work one way, B for another, C for a third but also with A, B uses C but not A, and D uses A&B but not C ___ Isn't a "no" better than an ignore? |
|
|
I noticed when selecting this skill in the character screen is doesn't show a crit chance or multiplier. Does this skill not have the ability to crit?
If it does, both global and spell crit should apply correct? | |
|
I'd also like to know what the deal is with crit here.
Devolving Wilds
Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” |
|
|
it has no chance to crit
| |
" Does this mean it can never crit, or that it has no inherent chance to crit? Can the 5-10% additional chance to crit from Critical Weakness still cause critical hits? Would be pretty sweet, because I'm considering (trying to) build with obscene cast speed, something like 23 casts per second (assuming your own passive cast speed also buffs the cast speed of the totem... something I can never seem to remember). Devolving Wilds
Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” |
|
"Good Question! The skill can never have crit chance itself (applying % increases to 0 will get you nowhere), but yes, the additional chance to receive crits from critical weakness will apply. | |
" this must be why resolute tech players can crit... | |
|
No, "Never Crit" does not allow any crits to occur, including this stat. That's different from having no base crit chance.
Last edited by Mark_GGG on Oct 30, 2012, 7:21:16 PM
| |
|
Hmm, I was kind of surprised when I learned the projectile support gems work with the skill. Is a flamethrower really a projectile weapon?
Disregard witches, aquire currency.
| |
|
Well, everything in this game you shoot is kind of a projectile.
Zaanus:
Global chat: Mechanics for A work one way, B for another, C for a third but also with A, B uses C but not A, and D uses A&B but not C ___ Isn't a "no" better than an ignore? |
|
