Twister with multiple elements
|
Anyone have any clarification on this? Can the twisters only absorb 1 ground type at a time?
It's very hard to try to test with just ailments, would be cool if somebody knew. |
|
|
I tested Twister with Wake of Destruction boots + the Frostbolt skill (you can test it too).
I can confirm that visually the twisters picks up the 2 elements, i cannot confirm that the damages are adding or multiplying because enemy die too fast even with only one type of elemental damage in the twister. |
|
" Well that's new. Everyone is complaining how slow and boring clearing is, but it seems that there are people who one-shot all the content. Good for you, sir. |
|
" I don't think this is correct. I did a good deal of testing and I can't get my twisters to visually pick up two elements, with any of the combinations. I also tested frostbolts' cold ground with the fire trail boots on a boss multiple times, and the twister would never apply chill if they were red from being fire infused first, even after going over chilled ground before hitting the boss. Kind of a bummer, buuuut I suppose it makes sense as getting all 3 ground effects isn't too hard, and 150% damage as extra would make that skill way too powerful. |
|
" So you basically say that the common sense dictates, that doing two and half times your damage for free is not ok as a game design? Interesting... |
|
" Yes that's essentially what I said. Any reason for this reply? |
|
" From all the people around here, and in the reddit post btw, you are the first person that brings this up. And it was quite some time, before a human came up with your idea. We are talking weeks now... And I find this particularly interesting. |
|
|
It's really not interesting lol, no one was going to say they were SURE til it was tested so people posting about what they think it might logically be would have been a waste of time for anyone to say
What if twister was weak unless it had all 3 elements? You act like this is obvious but it isn't, it's a brand new skill. It absolutely could have been the case that you're expected to get 2 or 3 elements to make it string enough. So really no need to pretend whatever it is you're trying to imply here, that it's oh so interesting we didn't try to logic our way to a solution rather than wanting a definitive answer... It's actually quote logical! | |
" So you are telling me, that the "quite logical" decision you made, was not using any logic to find a solution? Am I reading this right? |
|
