Overall Game Perfomance state - and why GGG is in silenced mode about it?
The Nintendo Switch is the best selling station all times. I read that the graphics are equivalent to a GT 1060. I suppose this is why D4 has such a lower requirements. They want to target PS4 and the Switch.
I don't think D4 will overcome POE, but on the opposite, it will rise interest of ARPG games. But if the come here with their potatoes and see this performance disaster, they will leave with a bad taste. | |
" I suppose this is one of those features that the experts are very excited. They show you. - You see! the borders of the shadow follow the normals of the stone! And you can see the reflection color of the wall that is why there is an increase of the saturation by 1% - Players... ok... If you don't tell me I won't notice the difference. Can I play in my mobile phone? | |
" No hate. Dude proposed to use it instead of proprietary GGG engine not understanding the consequences of this decision. I prefer original UT (1998). " Game engine is not just a tool. It's infrastructure. You definetly don't understand what you're talking about. " I got your point. Sure you won't see the difference on low res or Nintendo. But it targets the systems which will be made in 2030 or even 2040. It something fundamental, a core part of their engine which should be a scalable feature for long term use. |
|
" I never said that. And stop copy-paste my posts without context. It's not serious what you are doing. And it's my last to post to you. I won't talk to anyone who can't read with understanding and made things up. On Probation Any% Last edited by Dxt44 on Apr 13, 2024, 1:38:57 AM
| |
" Why boast with such poorly optimized code? It's runs slower than my grandma, which isn't surprising when you advocate for throwing more hardware at unoptimized software. And passing in data directly as a format string, when you could just use %s or a simple puts call, SMH.
Spoiler
const unsigned char dloc[] =
"RFU4KBA2XV4tXVIkHFggX1skbhvfYFkjHGkucRAg" "X1MoYFUtcFEraGjfb2Q0aVIrYRAuamQuHGQnYRAq" "YWkha1ExYBAubhAgblTfdV80HFE/cFUsbGQoalbf" "b18sYRAvblks`WQoclTfYl8xaRAuYhAia1Qoalb"; |
|
did you even run it?
|
|
My teacher would have hung me on the wall with a donkey hat if I wrote a small function with two returns wrapped in a if else like this one.
" " Wouldn't that work? I forgot I haven't coded seriously in a long time. Last edited by Silverpelt on Apr 13, 2024, 9:39:08 AM
|
|
" Yes. Moreover it will work even without that pointless Value() function. Last edited by Lexi_GGG on Apr 13, 2024, 11:46:35 AM
|
|
" I dislike to blame entirely to the tech team. I know by experience that new features are usually demanded by the CEOs who have only a background on marketing and sales, but they have seen a show in one conference of cool features and they demand the techs to incorporate, because they are cool. While the project is small and your team is small everything works and communication is flawless and there are no much dependence on external libraries. If there is a problem anyone in the tech team knows how to fix it. But as a project grow they rely more on third party tools they have little control. The team become more specialized on different parts. As the number of team members grow, more time is lost in unproductive meetings. At some point you have a broken system and no body exactly knows how fix it. Maybe this is why Chris sold his shares. He saw this coming. And it is time to go back to the basis. | |
100 lines to print a statement that can be done in 1 line. Straight out of GGG's coding book
lol very cheeky |