Code of Conduct Changes - Do better at least for optics

Concerning optics they just picked a really bad day to implement.

As far as interpretation and vagueness, they are already openly censoring non political, etc. topics. I got censored for complaining about a tech issue.

Whatever you do, don't complain about the delay in patch notes. That'll get whacked too.

jeez what did you guys do lol

"

I_NO wrote:

jeez what did you guys do lol

It isn't what we did. It is what we will now do. With the wise decision by GGG now we have no choice but to embrace each others humanity in love and respect. [hug] XXXOOOXOXOXO smooch embrace throw kisses [/hug]

"

I_NO wrote:

jeez what did you guys do lol

We taught the horse to sing.

"

Sarah_GGG wrote:

There will likely be fringe cases. For example, where the overall discussion in a thread continues to stray into territory breaching our rules: after multiple warnings/staff posts where we would consider closing the entire thread.

So people could organize to get a thread they don't like nuked...

the only effect will be more people moving to reddit, the positive effect for ggg is less moderation needed here.

well. about time to take some time off from these forums.

"

vio wrote:

the only effect will be more people moving to reddit, the positive effect for ggg is less moderation needed here.

well. about time to take some time off from these forums.

It also applies to global channels in-game, so there's not going to be much positive effect for GGG from this any time soon. The forums are actually incredibly tame compared to a lot of what goes on in global.

On the forums it's like opening a can of worms that probably didn't really need to be opened. For global it's more like opening a crate of venomous snakes that explicitly says "WARNING: DO NOT OPEN!"

"

鬼殺し wrote:

It's just a fact that we now live in a world where certain topics just won't end well

That is clearly an opinion, not a fact. Myself, I'm satisfied just fine when I've made my case against a debate opponent who obstinately refuses to be persuaded. Maybe that's because I don't write to the one I'm arguing so much as to the greater audience.

You seem to think a virtual fight that ends in IRL butthurt didn't end well. I think that's a rather peculiar thought for a Path to Exile player to have. Especially if they play HC. Should we get rid of death penalties because feelings?

"

Turtledove wrote:

With the wise decision by GGG now we have no choice

Ah yes, the wisdom of authoritarianism. Oh what a burden is freedom! How enlightened it is to censor others! Because everyone knows how history has proven such a tactic to always, ahem, end well.

"

aggromagnet wrote:

"

vio wrote:

the only effect will be more people moving to reddit, the positive effect for ggg is less moderation needed here.

well. about time to take some time off from these forums.

It also applies to global channels in-game, so there's not going to be much positive effect for GGG from this any time soon. The forums are actually incredibly tame compared to a lot of what goes on in global.

On the forums it's like opening a can of worms that probably didn't really need to be opened. For global it's more like opening a crate of venomous snakes that explicitly says "WARNING: DO NOT OPEN!"

fun fact: with their account tagging for bad behaviour, ggg invented the social score before china did :-)

and while it makes sense to do this in secret, it's another thing to announce it publicly to profit from the chilling effects. it's wrong, cause it makes it look like it doesn't work internally just like chinas scoring system which isn't fully functional according to some knowledgeable guys.

so while i can partly understand ggg, it's the effect of even more players leaving the forums that disturbs me. and i liked to waste time reading offtopic opinions. you learn so much about other world views from that.

maybe i do some programming in my new, free time.
so long and thanks for all the fish