[3.14] Flame Golem 101 - Complete Guide To Golemancy, ✔️All Bosses Down, ✔️Necro, ✔️Elementalist

your POB and screenshot are completely different lmao, i do not recommend this build as it is unreliable

"

glear wrote:

your POB and screenshot are completely different lmao, i do not recommend this build as it is unreliable

Hello :)

Just updated the skill-tree screenshot, must have forgotten it in all the hassle. Thanks for the tip!

How has the build not being working for you?

its possible play this build with carrion golem?

Why my Tukohama's minions dont summon totems? I have multiple totems gem on.

"

uli_boss wrote:

Why my Tukohama's minions dont summon totems? I have multiple totems gem on.

Are you using Tukohama's Vanguards? There are multiple enemies that start with Tukohama's.

Hi, do you still use Vis Mortis, at any point in this build?

"

NoiTuLove wrote:

its possible play this build with carrion golem?

Hey :)

Carrion Golems seem to be geared towards non-Golemancer minion builds. You need 10x other minions to get full damage buff from Carrion Golems. Carrion Golem can add some damage to Flame Golems, but Tukohamas are not hitting enemies at all so the added damage wont help them.

You can probably modify the build or use it as a base by replacing Flame Golems with Carrion Golems / Ice Golems and Specs with something like Zombies or SRS.

"

uli_boss wrote:

Why my Tukohama's minions dont summon totems? I have multiple totems gem on.

"

Are you using Tukohama's Vanguards? There are multiple enemies that start with Tukohama's.

Hi :)

Yep, there are several enemies that look very much the same. You need the "Tukohama Vanguards", so try to avoid the "Kaoms Chosen" and and other similar enemies that might look like Vanguards.

"

Hi, do you still use Vis Mortis, at any point in this build?

Hello :)

Vis Mortis just went legacy with 3.8.0. Old version has still +1 Spec, which is very much OP comparing to the new variant.

I'm not sure yet if new Vis will be worth it, but it adds quite a lot of chaos damage to Flame Golems. Problem is that I doubt that added damage works with Tukohamas. I would recommend running only Skin of the Loyal or similar armor with clear benefits for now.

---

UPDATE

PLEDGE OF HANDS ELEMENTALIST - SHAPER RUN

https://youtu.be/jwv_Nzr3V_4?t=78

Added Shaper boss run with Pledge of Hands Elementalist. Gems, gear and tree is at the beginning of the video.

Path of Building (PoB)

https://pastebin.com/CUE1F33s

Path of Building does not show real DPS, as it does not have data of new "Pledge of Hands" -staff yet and the "Elemancer" -ascendancy node is broken in PoB. Real DPS is much higher than reported and orbs can splash creating shotgun effect.

"

mika2salo wrote:

UPDATE

PLEDGE OF HANDS ELEMENTALIST - SHAPER RUN

https://youtu.be/jwv_Nzr3V_4?t=78

Added Shaper boss run with Pledge of Hands Elementalist. Gems, gear and tree is at the beginning of the video.

Path of Building (PoB)

https://pastebin.com/CUE1F33s

Path of Building does not show real DPS, as it does not have data of new "Pledge of Hands" -staff yet and the "Elemancer" -ascendancy node is broken in PoB. Real DPS is much higher than reported and orbs can splash creating shotgun effect.

Are you trying to make me regret about going for necromancer ?
Cause you doing great ;'DDDDDDDDD

Is EE boosting damage to minions in this build? Only fire damage. Or I'm missing something

Hey i am currently trying out the pledge build as my league starter for blight. Was able to farm up the pledge/ammy with a 3 golems in a 4L Wraithlord, and some carnage cheiftans to buff them up. It has been pretty smooth, and im now into t9/10 maps with mediocre gear and melting the bosses.

Obviously my gear is pretty bad, maybe 250c spent on everything so far. But this is going really well as my league starter, and each jewel i get i can feel the power spiking up. I think i might actually put some real investment into this build. Im still not sure whether i stick with the pledge/shavs plan, or go for a corrupted +1 skin with clayshaper/victarios.