Portal in the passive Tree
" What if they allow stemming from the notable instilled? Maybe that is better idea than "portals"... I mean... You instill some notable and you can allocate X points around it based on something else... HC SSF. What else? Ruthless when? Last edited by vestolevs#5239 on Jun 30, 2025, 9:37:05 AM
|
![]() |
+1. Fly over paths. And then all players gonna choose ES.
Pathetic but inevitable! |
![]() |
Good idea
|
![]() |
Or a specific jewel that will open portal to a place in p.tree and continue from there the path. But need more jewel sockets then.
| |
Bump... More diversity need more paths...
|
![]() |
+1. Fly over paths with no extra punishments.
|
![]() |
+1. And if you bring it to people don't forget to accompained it with Extra punishment as always.
|
![]() |
+1. Maybe 4 big portals in a cross in Passive tree will boost significant the paths.
|
![]() |
Not sure this would promote diversity or homogenize the meta.
More paths doesnt always mean more options if 1-2 options stand head and shoulders above the rest. Stuff like mace nodes are meant to be easier to reach as a warrior, same with monk and quarterstaff or any other archetype. If any class can teleport to another section of the tree it removes some of what makes the archetypes diverse/distinct. I'd rather more unique jewels that allow builds to select unconnected nodes. "Beidat honored the pact, though Mancy wouldn't take off Doryani’s prototype."
|
![]() |
"Portal in the passive tree" sounds like a good AI prompt to make a country music song about spending all your beer money on respects and ending up broke.
|
![]() |