GGG, Enough is Enough – Ban These Scammers AND All Their Related Accounts!
" "pretty hard to prove" you must have took something funny haven't you ? what's so hard about "proving" a scam when you get a direct link from GGG's website directly into the game with the item you requested. and when GGG can check the chats and see that no different aggreement have been made after that direct message? the only exception would be if chats happened outside of the game, and although that can be proved since in most cases you will see chat histories in discord and other wise, at the very least you can see if the action have been reperted by the scammed people. and if the scammer gets reported like 5+ times in a day for example or maybe 10 times a week "whatever GGG thinks is the proper number of reports" and every time they have a proper direct link from their website with the item and the scamer put a different one without any further messaging for different agreement. |
|
" The term "scam" implies malicious intent. You can't prove intent based on a mismatch between the trade request and the trade itself. I.e, a mistake or lack of attention on the sellers part is not a scam. Proving the seller didn't simply make a mistake is not actually possible. The best GGG can do is trend analysis across multiple reports and make an informed assumption. “Freedom is what we do with what is done to us.”
|
|
" The reason "trade is bad" in a LOT of cases is because players don't pay attention to what they are trading for, an auction house will not fix that. Ancestral Bond. It's a thing that does stuff. -Vipermagi
He who controls the pants controls the galaxy. - Rick & Morty S3E1 |
|
I blame Elon Ma
xdd Last edited by skaterboy80#3665 on Jan 26, 2025, 4:39:13 PM
|
|
it's a weird effect but it seems that the higher the trade value, the less attention people pay towards the trade.
might be the sweaty fingers when they supposedly make the deal of their lifetime with a newb? age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill! Last edited by vio#1992 on Jan 26, 2025, 6:13:28 PM
|