0.1.0d Hotfix 2

"

Holy cow people are salty, they are probably working their asses of on updates to fix bugs etc but they are releasing some stuff that they can fix quickly and you people are salty.. smh

"

dizz#2756 wrote:

"

Waited 5 years for this game and making a character nearly unplayable MID-LEAGUE is rough when it happens to you. Maybe your build will be next I guess.

I'll just play different games with the boys and wait until v1.0 when this game is more balanced, ideally no more massive mid-league / mid-launch changes in a PvE game. This isn't a competitive pvp esport.

"mid-league" lol. It's fucking EA dude, what's wrong with this playerbase?!

Balance changes are important, best do them as early as possible. And yes, I am playing a nerfed build (Slams Titan). You guys SERIOUSLY need to touch grass.

"

gylbert#1879 wrote:

Holy cow people are salty, they are probably working their asses of on updates to fix bugs etc but they are releasing some stuff that they can fix quickly and you people are salty.. smh

"

Phenomanon#0759 wrote:

"

Dan0224#2242 wrote:

After your destroyed CoF/CoC I chose to wait and see if you're going to respond to the overwhelming feedback, but at this point I see that my sorc really goes to the trash bin. Good job with the "balancing".

Before I start new character and put 40 hours into it, could you please let me know which one do you plan to nuke into the oblivion next? Thank you

I'm giving them another day to realize they ruined the game for an entire class.
If CoF isn't restored to a playable state by EOD tomorrow, I'm getting a refund from Steam.

I supported Blizzard and all their bad designs for entirely too long. You have to acknowledge a toxic relationship early on to avoid the abuse.

This is definitely shaping up to be that way.

Fool me once, shame on me... That goes out to all the game developers in the world. We're done with your abuse.

"

BigDaddy6789#3515 wrote:

I appreciate the effort and passion that goes into the development of this game, but I feel compelled to provide some constructive feedback regarding recent updates and the overall direction of the game during early access.

Skill Nerfs and Gameplay Balance:
Recent adjustments, particularly to "cast on freeze," "cast on fire," "cast on shock," and "cast on crit" mechanics, have significantly impacted what made the game enjoyable for many players. While balance is important, early access should prioritize creating a fun and engaging experience for the community. These adjustments feel premature and overly restrictive, especially given that early access is meant for experimentation and refining core gameplay.

Rather than immediately focusing on nerfs, a better approach might be to observe the broader player base, collect data, and introduce adjustments after a longer observation period—perhaps two weeks to a month. This would allow for more informed balancing while maintaining the fun factor that early access players are looking for.

Campaign Quality of Life Improvements:
The campaign could benefit from tangible quality-of-life enhancements. For example:

Map size: After Act 1, the map sizes can feel unnecessarily large, leading to fatigue rather than immersion. Streamlining these areas would greatly enhance the overall experience.
Minion AI: Minion builds, while promising, are often rendered ineffective due to pathfinding issues, especially in corridor-heavy or doorway-centric maps. Improving AI navigation would address this problem and make these builds more viable across all map types.
Drop Rates and Economy:
The promised improvements to exalted orb drop rates haven’t been noticeable, with many players reporting little to no improvement even after extensive campaign play. If drop rates are adjusted, they should be communicated clearly with visible results to maintain player trust.

Respec Costs and Flexibility:
Respec costs are prohibitively high, particularly given the nerfs to core mechanics like "cast on" effects. Players who have invested significant time into their builds are now facing unreasonable barriers to adapt. Offering free respecs after such substantial changes or significantly reducing the respec cost would be a fair and player-friendly approach.

Communication with the Community:
Communication is crucial, especially during early access. Engaging openly with players—acknowledging feedback, providing updates, and discussing future plans—would foster goodwill and trust. Other games, such as Last Epoch, have demonstrated the value of consistent and transparent developer communication. Adopting similar practices could make a significant difference.

Monetary Investment and Trust:
Many of us are passionate supporters of this project, and some are considering significant financial contributions. However, the current trajectory, particularly the focus on nerfs over foundational improvements, has given pause. Building trust through visible improvements and better communication will be key to ensuring long-term player support.

In summary, the purpose of early access should be to refine the game with player feedback while prioritizing fun and accessibility. Addressing these issues would not only improve the current experience but also reassure the community that their time and investment are valued.

Thank you for your hard work, and I hope this feedback is helpful in shaping the future of the game.

PS: Remember the most valuable resource is TIME for your players and you should make their time worth it on your game.