Killing uber bosses with a condition is insane in ruthless

"

Pashid wrote:

There's not a single scenario where you rely on pantheons for Ubers.

That's literally BS. Solaris is probably the best option for uber if you have the source of Stun immunity or even don't have it.

- 6% phys damage reduction with 20% chance virtually avoid AoE damage
- 8% reduced ele damage
- cannot take 2 and more consequtive crit strikes

This is very strong addition to the build. As the other participant told, you have no clue what's going on in this mode not playing it. You are not HC player and you are not HC R player.

"

Pashid wrote:

You don't gain any charges during Ubers anyways unless in some build cases.

This is just not true. Probably you even don't play PoE at all, because this statement has no fundamental basis.
Flask charges

[Removed by Support]

"

cursorTarget wrote:

"

Pashid wrote:

You don't gain any charges during Ubers anyways unless in some build cases.

This is just not true.

You don't have much tech to work with in ruthless so it's not entirely wrong. You can play some around with PF but you're heavily limited on everything else because you can't make use of other ways to gain charges in a efficient way to rely on flasks for a uber fight. Just alone the change that you can't gain charges during your short flask effect makes the pf node and the gain charge when you are hit pretty weak if not worthless for ubers cause most of all builds ain't even able to face tank ubers casually with the low amount of giving power in ruthless.
But I mean yea you can make use of your 6 portals to refill flasks, but that's not really a passive flask charge gain during a fight.

The simple truth is that there's plenty of people who did it and the people complaining are just not as good as they think they are. People wanted something hard to brag about, now deal with it. Period.

"

AdRonZh3Ro wrote:

The simple truth is that there's plenty of people who did it and the people complaining are just not as good as they think they are. Period.

Except if you were following this discussion you'd know that the people who've done Ubers are also complaining about them being in challenges. Not sure why you're trying to spin this as some kind of insulting gotcha to the ruthless playerbase.

Just another person with nothing of value to add to the discussion, and nothing to gain or lose from its consequences, but a desperate need to be part of it regardless.

It seems the difference between SC R and HC R is even worse than for normal modes:

"

Pashid wrote:

To bad they closed the alpha discord, else I could provide you the proof that people did that stuff during the alpha.

I was rank 3 at level 82 and I was barely in yellow maps. The rank 2 guy was a glasscannon deadeye which did push a bit further into red maps and the rank 1 guy had less progression than both rank 2 and 3 but he grinded a ton. No one did ubers in alpha, just stop.

Out of exp alone none of those characters killed enough monsters to even proc the quest version of the bosses

"

Hogaric wrote:

"

Pashid wrote:

To bad they closed the alpha discord, else I could provide you the proof that people did that stuff during the alpha.

I was rank 3 at level 82 and I was barely in yellow maps. The rank 2 guy was a glasscannon deadeye which did push a bit further into red maps and the rank 1 guy had less progression than both rank 2 and 3 but he grinded a ton. No one did ubers in alpha, just stop.

Out of exp alone none of those characters killed enough monsters to even proc the quest version of the bosses

Thanks for chiming in. Slander versus Ruthless is already bad enough on Reddit, so I'm glad that blatant lies and wrong information get called out. I didn't play the Ruthless alpha but I would have been surprised had I learned that someone beat uber pinnacles then