Poll: Do you want an instant buyout for the Trade Market? Let your voice be heard!

"

Eternal_Eclipse_ wrote:

Have any of you voting “yes” actually read the development manifesto on trading? Do you guys understand why GGG is against making trading easy? It says in plain black and white that if they make item trading too easy. It will further encourage people who use automation software not to mention that GGG has said they would have to nerf drop rates!

Ya’ll think this is bad? Be grateful that item trading still exists at the level it does in this game. It only took Diablo 3 one season to completely ruin their trade system. If a multibillion dollar corporation like Blizz couldn’t get it right, I actually applaud indie GGG for coming this far. My vote? No, don’t go the way of the ARPG giant that failed miserably.

I’d be all for removing the anonymity from the trade board. Put the persons PSN account name or Gamertag somewhere in this listing and it’ll be easy to spot the price fixers. “Who do I buy from? It_That_Trades or fjeodjebfjdjebebk”?

"

Filix80 wrote:

"

Eternal_Eclipse_ wrote:

Have any of you voting “yes” actually read the development manifesto on trading? Do you guys understand why GGG is against making trading easy? It says in plain black and white that if they make item trading too easy. It will further encourage people who use automation software not to mention that GGG has said they would have to nerf drop rates!

Ya’ll think this is bad? Be grateful that item trading still exists at the level it does in this game. It only took Diablo 3 one season to completely ruin their trade system. If a multibillion dollar corporation like Blizz couldn’t get it right, I actually applaud indie GGG for coming this far. My vote? No, don’t go the way of the ARPG giant that failed miserably.

I’d be all for removing the anonymity from the trade board. Put the persons PSN account name or Gamertag somewhere in this listing and it’ll be easy to spot the price fixers. “Who do I buy from? It_That_Trades or fjeodjebfjdjebebk”?

Well, they said on pc, search is easy, but buying takes the efford, on console they wanted to turn this around, make the search hard, which is totally true but the transaction easy.

And this is their misstake in the concept, the trade is not easy, you spend hours day by day trying to find your stuff in hundreds of pages like a helm enchant and then, well the transaction is not accepted, even if you offer the asked price.

Also you should consider, that chinese pc version has the tradeboard as console and they HAVE buyout already.

Tbh I work with automation at work, if you want to automate trading on console a buyout is not needed.

I mean I have pc and console. I prefer to play on console as its not full of farming bots that flood the whole market, so items are actually valuable. It feels many times like ssf, just with an option to still get the few essential items that enables you to play almost any build, if you can afford it. I would be even ok if they just do instant buyout for currency items, maps, essences etc, everything stackable you would want to buy in bulk anyway.

"

Eternal_Eclipse_ wrote:

Have any of you voting “yes” actually read the development manifesto on trading? Do you guys understand why GGG is against making trading easy? It says in plain black and white that if they make item trading too easy. It will further encourage people who use automation software not to mention that GGG has said they would have to nerf drop rates!

Ya’ll think this is bad? Be grateful that item trading still exists at the level it does in this game. It only took Diablo 3 one season to completely ruin their trade system. If a multibillion dollar corporation like Blizz couldn’t get it right, I actually applaud indie GGG for coming this far. My vote? No, don’t go the way of the ARPG giant that failed miserably.

I’d be all for removing the anonymity from the trade board. Put the persons PSN account name or Gamertag somewhere in this listing and it’ll be easy to spot the price fixers. “Who do I buy from? It_That_Trades or fjeodjebfjdjebebk”?