Asked my Astronomy teacher a question...
" I misread this as "I know it's incinerate" and I am inclined to agree with that sentiment, even if it IS a misreading :D :D :D [19:36]#Mirror_stacking_clown: try smoke ganja every day for 10 years and do memory game Last edited by crunkatog on Dec 18, 2019, 2:32:28 PM
| |
" Yeah... And who will decide who is or isnt stupid? You? Me? Somebody else? Last edited by de99ial on Dec 18, 2019, 3:37:16 PM
| |
" Radio waves decay over time, they are not "always detectable". "Path of Exile's engine is currently modern, lean and fast." - Chris Wilson, September 19th, 2019 "It looks like we broke something with 3.10.0. We don't know what it is yet." - Bex, March 16th, 2020 Last edited by girng on Dec 20, 2019, 5:07:29 PM
| |
|
Radio waves are actually not the worst kind of transmission to send out. To use a term we're all familiar with, they have a great area of effect, as opposed to, say, a laser, which would travel a longer distance in a shorter amount of time, but would require very precise aim to get the message from sender to receiver.
In any event, a civilization advanced enough for us to consider them advanced would likely want nothing to do with us... unless it was to take our lunch money and give us an atomic wedgie. War and technological advancement go hand in hand. [quote="Lovecraftuk"]I think the new meta is everyone bitching about the new league. [/quote]
|
|
" " Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_wave They do but in vacuum this process is very very slow. Also if thats true then our radiotelescopes should work like shit but they dont. We as a species are quarantined. Last edited by de99ial on Dec 21, 2019, 1:22:48 AM
| |
" I think the benefit is to knock humans a step down so they remember that we are not an all powerful race thats bound to be here forever. Just look at global warming, and how we are still doing basically nothing actually impactful on a global scale to combat this. I conclude from this that humans as a species, are a whole lot more stupid then what most think. An intelligent species does not consistently destroy it's own habitat | |
" I suggest you look up entropy and open up any biology book. Every living species depends on destruction for its survival and the intake of energy from a secondary source. Grass takes in sunlight and in doing so, prevents thats energy from reaching another species that could survive of it. A deer eats the grass to take in the energy, again preventing another species from doing so. A lion eats the deer to take in that energy etc etc But when we see a lion hunt a deer we don't think of it like that, because thats a rational thought excercise. An equilibrium state doesn't by any means imply the absence of destruction of your own habitat.(its only observation is that the destruction rate is equal to the regeneration rate of a habitat) If you had mentioned scale, your post would have made a bit more sense, but you didn't. Not going to get into climate change stuff, because the plausibility that you actually looked into the ippc data and have the skillset to interpret it is minute and the chance that you are just mirorring a talking point is high. I would back that assumption up with the fact that you think people aren't actually starting up massive enterprises to combat recycling/energy and sustainability issues. The first question i ask any climate change 'activist' is "are you pro nuclear energy" to see if they actually looked into any data whatsoever and if they are ideologically confused. Feel free to answer that question for me if you feel the need to do so, but im not holding my breath on a random gaming forum :) Peace, -Boem- Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes
|
