ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP
On the other hand, the Supreme Court is being politicized, and the Republicans did something more offensive two years ago than psychologically torture a family on national TV. They elected a man.
A man with built in Big Mac storage and a plan. Devolving Wilds
Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” |
|
^ like the leftist mob wasn't tearing down your historical statues 2 years ago already.
Happy Columbus day! On, no wait, Columbus was a nazi white supremist. Tear it down!! Rabid leftism will become more violent as it feels the institutions slipping away, yes. You can even expect terror attacks. But this would be inevitable in any case. The basis for attacking the American foundations and European identity was placed a long time ago, way before Trump. Where do you think these marxist fanatics, activist judges and biased fake "journalists" are coming from? From your own universities. Restoring law and order will require squashing some cysts. The other alternative is USA and its institutions slowly crumbling away into a South American style socialist hellhole. Once half of USA becomes Mexico 2.0 run by a Democrat mobster system, you can kiss goodbye your constitution, gun rights, safety and libertarian principles. When night falls She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness Last edited by morbo#1824 on Oct 9, 2018, 3:58:26 AM
|
|
Now that I think more about it, the Dem's midterm strategy will be "escalate." As I said before, they don't have time to pivot, so somehow being more rabid than during the Kavanaugh hearings will happen. Briefly. It won't work, there won't be a blue wave, and then they'll pivot.
But we should expect (an attempt at) the most crazed social justice inquisition ever in 2-3 weeks. The final push. The death throes. It's not actually over yet. We're just past the point in the fight where Frieza Destructo Disks himself. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Oct 9, 2018, 6:45:04 PM
|
|
" I... Can't even tell if you're being ironic or not |
|
" I just hope they don't end up killing a bunch of people, especially in cities like Portland, OR where the mayor lets Antifa control portions of city streets and redirect traffic. https://conservativefiringline.com/antifa-takes-over-portland-whos-really-in-charge/ Then we have school teachers calling for violence: https://www.foxnews.com/us/minnesota-teacher-who-tweeted-call-to-kill-kavanaugh-resigns " Even if they did have time, they wouldn't. The dramatic surge in emotions is what motivates their target SJWs. Fear, Pain, Hate, Violence, Suffering - all good to leftist strategists. Happiness is alien to them, and transitory at best for a group with chronic depression symptoms. " It will definitely get worse for awhile. PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
|
|
Censorship Good! Google declares.
85-page briefing, internal Google document titled “The Good Censor" full document published here https://www.scribd.com/document/390521673/The-Good-Censor-GOOGLE-LEAK#from_embed A few of the things in the briefing: Page 2 – The briefing states that “users are asking if the openness of the internet should be celebrated after all” and that “free speech has become a social, economic, and political weapon.” Page 14 – The briefing admits that Google, along with Twitter and Facebook, now “control the majority of online conversations.” Page 54 – After warning about “harassment” earlier in the document, the briefing approvingly describes a 27,000-strong left-wing social media campaign as a “digital flash mob” engaged in “friendly counter-commenting.” Pages 66-68 – The briefing argues that Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are caught between two incompatible positions, the “unmediated marketplace of ideas” vs. “well-ordered spaces for safety and civility.” The first is described as a product of the “American tradition” which “prioritizes free speech for democracy, not civility.” The second is described as a product of the “European tradition,” which “favors dignity over liberty and civility over freedom.” The briefing claims that all tech platforms are now moving toward the European tradition. Page 70 – The briefing sums up the reasons for big tech’s “shift towards censorship,” including the need to respond to regulatory demands and “expand globally,” to “monetize content through its organization,” and to “protect advertisers from controversial content, [and] increase revenues.” https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/09/the-good-censor-leaked-google-briefing-admits-abandonment-of-free-speech-for-safety-and-civility/ PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910 Last edited by DalaiLama#6738 on Oct 10, 2018, 1:18:21 AM
|
|
Sounds like they’re trying to subvert the 1st via associating it with anarchy, subvert the 2nd by cornering innocent people to defend themselves, to be used as an excuse to later amend.
It’s almost as if the Soviet Union is alive and well within our political establishments. Devolving Wilds
Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” |
|
"This is the heart of the matter. It is easy to let oneself believe that Google is a political organization rather than a for-profit corporation — and I have no doubt some of its own employees share that delusion. But Google is ultimately about chasing that paper. Currently advertisers — and thus media companies that sell advertisements — are mostly subservient to social justice. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be afraid of controversy — if eyeballs from their target demographic were looking at controversial content, they'd want to advertise on that content. However, they don't, because the common belief now is that advertisement implies endorsement and being seen as endorsing the wrong views can put the brand in danger. Of course, in practice advertising has never been more dissociated from the content it's attached to. Google ads use all kinds of data about your habits, tailored specifically to you, to decide which ads to pester you with — regardless of whatever you're watching. In catering to the notion that ads imply endorsement, Google is breathing artificial life into an obsolete paradigm whose time has came and went. Such recalcitrance makes some degree of sense for the legacy media, such as cable and newsprint, but it's downright absurd to see Google behaving this way. It's not like Google is adjusting their old methods to a new AdSense world — they quite literally invented that world and stole huge swaths of the legacy media's advertising marketshare doing it. They should be bringing change, but it seems that now that they're huge they want to play by the same legacy media rulebook they ripped up earlier, to become big in the first place. Google has been cucked out of being what it once was. It's a shame, because that entire presentation is built on a premise that nobody should know better than Google is a lie. If they really wanted to increase revenues, they'd finish the job they started and complete the destruction of legacy media. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Oct 10, 2018, 5:48:21 PM
|
|
is it just me or the left has been more and more aggressive and violent over the last few months? And not just in the US but everywhere.
|
|
" No, they are getting more crazy and violent by the day, seemingly. Censored.
|
|