ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"

1453R wrote:

If Comey was as crooked as you say - and he might well be, I haven't done any in-depth research on that part - then FBI Internal Affairs should've been on his case.

But you jumped to a conclusion nonetheless. And the very problem is, the 'FBI Internal Affairs' did nothing, because they are corrupt unfortunately, which is partly thanks to Trump's predecessors. That is the very reason for the talk about 'the swamp' and 'the deep state'. Now you're in the know. Dig a little deeper and you'll find the rabbit hole continues further...

The question you should be asking is: why was Comey even allowed to 'investigate' Trump in the first place? That is the next question you should be asking. Forget the tweets and the rhetoric for a change, and start looking at the facts. Actions speak louder than words, if you're paying attention.

I'll give you an example: the strikes in Syria last week. My first reaction was to yell at the television while listening to Trump's speech about 'animal Assad' with rebuttals such as, "This is Iraq and 'wmds' all over again!" until I started noticing some very conspicuous details in the days following. The areas that were struck for instance. It's very clear that they were targeting very specific areas. The photos are online for anyone willing to do a simple Google search. You'll also find that there were no casualties, almost as if...wait for it...the Syrians and Russians were warned in advance. A bit coincidental, don't you think? So all I'm saying is, rather than act on an emotional whim and jump to conclusions, which we're all prone to doing, why not try to look at the facts from a different angle and see the bigger picture? People that make the claim that Trump is incompetent or unintelligent aren't paying much attention to what's going on.

The FBI doesn't need 2 years almost, to figure out something like this.

It's a fishing expedition, and will only result in "other" kinds of charges, and probably none of them against Trump. Or definitely charges that won't get him impeached but have nothing to do with "Russia collusion".

The ONLY reason certain republicans sided with democrats to start this thing, was because they wanted to keep it over trump's head... "If you side too much with russia, we will impeach you".

All the while the FBI bungles countless other cases, like the florida shooter etc.

The FBI needs a massive house cleaning and it can and WILL only come, after this mess is over.

Trump will then feel free to fire Rosenstein, Sessions, etc etc etc.

It will be a fun day.

In fact they KNOW it's coming for them, and it's probably part of the reason this stupid witch hunt is being dragged out, forever.

#JobSecurity

"

Khoranth wrote:

It's a recorded fact that Russians tried to hack both parties, the Republicans reported it to the FBI, the Democrats fell for the phishing, and got screwed.

Just because you have not seen a fact, does not mean it does not exist LOL nice logic

Can you guarantee that Trump's team wasn't warned beforehand about any hack/scam attempts?
Were said republicans on Trump's side or against him?
Would any information harmful to Trump have been leaked even if they fell for the phishing?

"Just because you have not seen a fact, does not mean it does not exist"

There exists no proof of Russians trying to harm Trump's campaign. On the other hand, a quick google search gave me this result:

"

"Does the [intelligence community]'s conclusion that the Russians sought to assist President-elect Trump’s campaign depend on an assessment, then, that the Russians covertly collected information primarily from Democratic sources but some Republican sources as well, but only chose to release the derogatory information from the Democratic sources?" asked Senator Susan Collins.

"That's correct," answered DNI Clapper.

Try to wiggle your way out of that one?

"

Khoranth wrote:

And Trumps campaign being stupid & incompetent is evidence of stupidity and incompetence, not corruption.

Naivete.

"

Khoranth wrote:

And if someone from trump's campaign had fell for the phishing scam, the Russians would have been supporting Clinton, and it wouldn't be her fault, it would be the fault of the dummy who sent his password, password, to a hacker.

Assumptions without a shred of global political reasoning behind them. Even if we replace Trump with candidate X and assume that Clinton's rumored uranium and arms deals with Russia are real, Russia would STILL have plenty of reasons to hamper Clinton's campaign.

James Clapper, LOL, like I care about the opinion of a partisan hack, who is known to have leaked classified information to CNN for them to bash Trump with.

Quoting some partisans opinion is a waste of typing, completely irrelevant.

What's next? Gonna quote Hilary Clinton's opinions? Who cares

And you're asking me to guarantee something impossible to guarantee LOL nice form of argument. Waste of typing space

Can you guarantee me Trump isn't secretly a Sith Lord? LOL what's your next silly question?

"Oh shit I'm out of arguments, time to pull out the 'lol not worth my time' - card"

Since you value your beliefs over facts, I got nothing further to say.

There was a lot more hacking being performed by people of other nationalities...people really need to get off of the whole 'Russian hacking' narrative. There are brilliant 'hackers' all across the globe and every nation has its own agenda. We have influenced countless elections across the globe.

What is 'hacking' even? Anyone that can infiltrate a source, without prior approval and by unsavory means, could be classified as a 'hacker'. The entire narrative is as absurd as the entire 'war on terror' when the media constantly talked about Bin Laden. The media is controlled. Every major news source plays the same broken record and repeats it across every channel. We may as well be discussing Stormy Daniel's involvement in hacking the DNC, because it is that absurd. Zero evidence other than "because our intelligence agency said so." Right, just like how our 'credible' intelligence agency conspired to overthrow the president with a fake dossier, which has since been proven to have been funded by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-digger-who-commissioned-the-trump-russia-dossier-speaks

Surprise! If you read the article, you'll note that James Comey was aware of the dossier and its contents prior to it becoming public information. And people still question why Comey was shown the door...oh, that's right, because the media swept all of this under the rug shortly thereafter.

If you dig a little deeper than just this article, you'll also discover that this dossier was doctored and had been presented to a federal judge more than once to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil Trump, because it didn't qualify.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/7/christopher-steeles-trump-dossier-info-led-fbi-mis/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2018/01/30/did-the-fbi-vouch-for-the-crazy-russian-deal-from-the-steele-dossier/#1ce58321930c

By now, there should be a lot of flashing red warning signs going off for most people, but the media still keeps on with the 'Russian collusion' narrative. Yes, there was collusion that took place with Russians, but it was actually collusion between the DNC, Clinton campaign, and a Russian entity, which was then peddled by the FBI that was led by James Comey. There is irrefutable proof there with the Steele dossier, but nothing was ever done and the investigation with Mueller drags on with yet a shred of evidence.

I understand that you're willing to believe the dossier-scenario completely now that it perfectly fits your agenda, but personally I find it all too suspicious. I was skeptical and more or less ignored its validity when I first read about it, but as the story went on, I found it becoming bullshit on the highest degree.

Clinton paid a company to come up with fake dirt on Trump without covering her trails at all, fake dirt that was concocted by a seasoned MI6 veteran, dirt that was so blatantly fake that any half-assed news source could semi-debunk it. And then FBI colluded knowingly with Clinton based on this shoddy evidence.

What. You expect me to believe this scenario? Come on, this sounds about as realistic as the Trump piss party tape. Though what makes even less sense is the fact that Christopher Steele hasn't permanently disappeared yet. He's facing a total loss of credibility and possible criminal charges, not to mention there's a high likelihood he's on Kremlin's hit list now, yet he openly lives with his family with seemingly no intention to hide. No matter how you twist and turn the scenario around, his current behavior is incomprehensible.

Either way. I'd say about 20% or less of all the information media spreads and public knows about this charade is valid.

"

Anonymous1749704 wrote:

I understand that you're willing to believe the dossier-scenario completely now that it perfectly fits your agenda, but personally I find it all too suspicious. I was skeptical and more or less ignored its validity when I first read about it, but as the story went on, I found it becoming bullshit on the highest degree.

Clinton paid a company to come up with fake dirt on Trump without covering her trails at all, fake dirt that was concocted by a seasoned MI6 veteran, dirt that was so blatantly fake that any half-assed news source could semi-debunk it. And then FBI colluded knowingly with Clinton based on this shoddy evidence.

What. You expect me to believe this scenario? Come on, this sounds about as realistic as the Trump piss party tape. Though what makes even less sense is the fact that Christopher Steele hasn't permanently disappeared yet. He's facing a total loss of credibility and possible criminal charges, not to mention there's a high likelihood he's on Kremlin's hit list now, yet he openly lives with his family with seemingly no intention to hide. No matter how you twist and turn the scenario around, his current behavior is incomprehensible.

Either way. I'd say about 20% or less of all the information media spreads and public knows about this charade is valid.

A British spy was just poisoned and killed, allegedly by Russians (with strong emphasis on the word 'allegedly', because I'm very skeptical of that), and you believe that he's just whimsically walking around without any fears? Doubtful. I believe that anyone who lives in that hemisphere of the intelligence sector walks around with one eye over their own shoulder at all times.

As to the logical rationale as to why they would come around with such a dossier, I think the answer is actually quite simple: arrogance. I believe that the intelligence agencies, as well as the politicians they were in bed with, were so confident that they would bring Trump down with it, or it would blow over, that they didn't hesitate. Why would they hesitate? They have already gotten away with murder, quite literally, for decades. And the truth is, they've essentially been compromised by the truth and nothing has happened, so I think that's a fair assumption.

What other proof do you require to find this story credible? The judge's testimony of having denied them the FISA warrant on the first round for approval and their returning with the corrected version thereafter? It's out there.

This isn't 'my agenda'. I am just stating facts. Take them as you will.

I read r/politics every now and then. Judging by the headlines there, the Democrat platform seems to be:

1) muh Russia
2) Trump fucked Playboy models and pornstars way before he became President

That's basically it. The fuck?

"

Anonymous1749704 wrote:

"Oh shit I'm out of arguments, time to pull out the 'lol not worth my time' - card"

Since you value your beliefs over facts, I got nothing further to say.

LOL you pick & choose which facts to believe.

Any fact that doesn't fit your agenda, you disregard LOL

It is a waste of time to point out facts and truth to you...what's the point if you deny all facts that don't fit your agenda?