Increased Area of Effect
As an Ice Nova Witch, I tried both Increased Area of Effect and Concentrate Area of Effect gems. Wheras the increased AOE range is nice, it doesn't really hold a candle against the damage increase from the latter gem. With the increased radius passives, the range of my Ice Nova is still significant enough to warrant using a damage increase gem instead of a gem that increases the range of said AoE spell.
Domination:
Lvl 58 Power Siphon Witch | |
"why not use both? did that not come to mind? i'm confused people don't... at least nowdays... it used to be common practice to stack both passives (at least 40% via the two of the 3 AoE passive groups) and both of the supports for most AoE's. | |
" Of course it came to mind, but just like everyone else, I don't have an infinite amount of sockets. I currently have this: Like I said though, the AOE range of Ice Nova is still significant enough with just the passives that I got. If I had a 6-link, I'd probably use the other gem as well, if there's nothing better that is. It also really depends on how you want to play. Domination: Lvl 58 Power Siphon Witch Last edited by SeikenZ on Jul 18, 2013, 10:51:45 AM
| |
this gem has become very useful with Reave.
Reave-multi strike-incrased area of effect are must to make this skill work. My Craft Logs-thread/359202
| |
Please reduce the mana multiplier on this gem. It's certainly useful to increase area, but not even close to increasing the mana cost by 50%. More often than not you're already making a huge sacrifice to run this over damage supports on spells.
@Moylin (Beyond)
| |
It has a great use on utility skills which don't need dps. For example - curses, shockwave totem, even arctic armour.
Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 |
|
But with a lower modifier this could actually be useful for non DPS spells. And frankly, a lot of those spells aren't anywhere close to overpowered with increased AOE as it is. I'd just like to see this gem be more useful, and I think decreasing the mana multiplier would be a big way to help with that.
As is, you sacrifice so much for any DPS spell for this gem, getting some extra utility at a huge multiplier. This would be a fine tradeoff if the mana multiplier wasn't so high, but since it is so high you almost never want this gem on DPS abilities. Frankly, having to give up a gem slot for this gem most of the time is almost tradeoff enough. @Moylin (Beyond)
| |
this one is radius, right?
The numbers would be ridiculous with area... |
|
" Arctic Armour is not an area skill, so it does nothing to it. | |
" I'm not sure what meaning of «ridiculous» you used, but just in case, increased radius yields a better increase than an hypothetical increased area stat of the same percentage. |