Reaper Invocation "Missing socketed skill" Bug

My Reaper Invocation can no longer be toggled. It does not matter what spell I put in after bricking the gem.
https://imgur.com/d4lwxwL

What should happen is
https://imgur.com/FE3iuVO

Steps to reproduce (May not be exact bug given everything I think is important)
1. Setup (may not be extensive but this is how I reproduced it)
Invoker with Notable "Lead me through Grace"
Body Armour with "#% Increased Spirit Reservation Efficiency of skills"

2. Enable Reaper's Invocation and have low spirit (such that taking off the armour disables it)

3. Take off Body Armour, Reequip Body Armour. If Reaper's Invocation becomes untoggled then the bug is a success.

You can still re-toggle it but once you unequip it, it becomes brick.
https://imgur.com/C6kvG5p

I have tried to fix it by
1. Quality (failed)
2. Corrupt (failed)
3. Level up by using a higher level spirit gem (failed)
4. Using other spells (failed)
https://imgur.com/hhHnTDT

Have not tried bricking other "Meta" skill.

I was forced to make another 6-link Reaper Invocation.

Same thing just happened to me, also with a Reaper's Invocation. I'm also playing Invoker, not with "Lead me through Grace" but I bricked my Reaper's Invocation after doing a lot of skill tree fiddling that produced various situations where I no longer had enough spirit for all my spirit gems while I had the Reaper's Invocation enabled.

I had an Elemental Invocation enabled at the same time, with the same set of gems socketed in both invocations, but the Elemental Invocation remains un-bricked.

I couldn't figure out a way to un-brick it either, also had to make another Reaper's Invocation.

same thing here, made a new one still says "missing socketed skill"

I am in the same situation as you guys, don't know what to do! No matter what I try I can socket any support gems in the Reaper's invocation sockets due to the ''missing socketed skill'' restriction.
I've tried a few fixes found on youtube but nothing works. The devs need to fix this.
Have any of you solved this?