Too much nerfs
|
There is too much "nerfing to the ground"
The respec costs, time we spent playing and so on is not rewarding now. Instead of coming up with a clever solution, someone thought it's a great idea to destroy a plastyles completly. I remember GGG said they want to try to avoid nerfs, and look what's happening - all week of nerfing. Not cool Last bumped on Dec 12, 2024, 8:49:13 AM
|
|
|
its not even been out a week, if you want to avoid nerfs i would suggest coming back at 1.0. they are getting a massive influx of player data, stuff they couldnt possible prepare for and they have to create a floor of clear speed and difficulty they want to design for. theres no way around having outliers being super nerfed. i agree on the respec costs tho, you should be able to redo your build if they kill your playstyle.
Last edited by Roquefort720xTreme#7938 on Dec 12, 2024, 8:40:13 AM
|
|
" Imagine the solution to the devs knee jerk nerfs is to tell a player to avoid playing the game. How is this a viable thought to the players who keep saying it? Devs and players should want more players playing, not less players playing. If the solution to what devs are doing is to avoid playing than the devs are not doing the correct thing. If they are going to completely remove things from the game under the guise of a "nerf" then respecing should be free until they are done slaughtering skills/gems/ect. To blame the player and recommend not playing until the slaughter is done (which btw they could do again in the future even far after full release without warning). Instead of blaming the devs for a really shitty move is blaming the victim for something they didn't even deserve in the first place. |
|
